As an ancillary point to that; my cycling buddy and I have a "hooligan" ride, which we do on Wednesday evenings. It's 17.7 miles with 1030 feet of climbing and our best time ever was exactly one hour when we invited along a very fit and skinny former British hillclimb champion and it all got a bit competitive. Going the usual way, clockwise, there are two long drags and a couple of short fast downhills, which turn into short sharp climbs going anti-clockwise. (Locals will know the first few hundred yards of Waddington Fell from Waddie, as far as the emergency escape lane and the left turn on Cross Lane towards Bashall Eves).
Now, as a pair our best time round clockwise is 64 minutes, yet last Wednesday we went anticlockwise for a change and achieved 61 minutes without too much effort, we thought. When we sat down to think about it we couldn't work out whether the topography anti-clockwise would have favoured a faster speed or not and the more we thought about it the more addled our brains became.
I'm still trying to figure it out now! Are you better off doing long slow drags and short fast downhills or short sharp climbs and long fast downhills?