What had Ed Sheeran done wrong?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Shortfall

Über Member
Surely the real crime is him converting it to electric. I mean just why?
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Location
The Urban Fringe
A vehicle must have valid insurance unless it is declared SORN. It would seem Ed had not declared it SORN. Silly boy.

https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-insurance/uninsured-vehicles

There is no defence in law for car insurance offences. Being in a coma, your dog dying, having dementia and being sent to a care home (this one happens), the elderly car drver dying and the car being left to the non-driving spouse who doesn't understand the rules, none of it counts - you will be found guilty. It is an "absolute offence."

It is considered a dishonesty offence, so will show on an enhanced DBS check for all time. People dont appreciate how serious the consequences can be.
 

Fastpedaller

Über Member
Location
Norfolk
A vehicle must have valid insurance unless it is declared SORN. It would seem Ed had not declared it SORN. Silly boy.

https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-insurance/uninsured-vehicles

There is no defence in law for car insurance offences. Being in a coma, your dog dying, having dementia and being sent to a care home (this one happens), the elderly car drver dying and the car being left to the non-driving spouse who doesn't understand the rules, none of it counts - you will be found guilty. It is an "absolute offence."

It is considered a dishonesty offence, so will show on an enhanced DBS check for all time. People dont appreciate how serious the consequences can be.

Probably at it's worst a 90% reduced sentence for a repeat offender judging by today's news. :sad: :angry:
 

fossyant

Ride It Like You Stole It!
Location
South Manchester
TBH, I suspect he hadn't even though about SORN. His manager/PA etc should have. Ed does come over as having ADHD, as do many folk who are really good at some stuff, but crap at other, like 'life admin'.

I'd whack him with his best guitar for converting that car to electric. Restore, yes, but not to leccy. I'd allow an improved engine tune etc, but it has to stay original with a car like that.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Location
The Urban Fringe
Alas, the law is that while Ed can delegate the task he cannot delegate the responsibility.
 

Sharky

Legendary Member
Location
Kent
Slightly OT, but there is a car parked on the road, a few miles away. I've checked and it has a valid MOT and insurance, but both the near side tyres are completely flat. Thus not driveable atm. It's been like this for a few months.

Does this satisfy legal criteria.
 

DCLane

Found in the Yorkshire hills ...
Slightly OT, but there is a car parked on the road, a few miles away. I've checked and it has a valid MOT and insurance, but both the near side tyres are completely flat. Thus not driveable atm. It's been like this for a few months.

Does this satisfy legal criteria.

As long as it's taxed as well then it can be on the road.
 

spen666

Squire
A vehicle must have valid insurance unless it is declared SORN. It would seem Ed had not declared it SORN. Silly boy.

https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-insurance/uninsured-vehicles

There is no defence in law for car insurance offences. Being in a coma, your dog dying, having dementia and being sent to a care home (this one happens), the elderly car drver dying and the car being left to the non-driving spouse who doesn't understand the rules, none of it counts - you will be found guilty. It is an "absolute offence."

It is considered a dishonesty offence, so will show on an enhanced DBS check for all time. People dont appreciate how serious the consequences can be.
It is not a dishonesty offence.

Dishonesty requires mens rea. This as you rightly say earlier is an offence of strict liability which means there is no mens rea element.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Location
The Urban Fringe
Slightly OT, but there is a car parked on the road, a few miles away. I've checked and it has a valid MOT and insurance, but both the near side tyres are completely flat. Thus not driveable atm. It's been like this for a few months.

Does this satisfy legal criteria.

It its clearly in a state of disrepair, then even if it has current documents it may be classed as abandoned. It is an offence to abandon a vehicle on public land so your local council may or may not take action depending on their policy.

I've one on the go myself at the moment. A Fiat 500, nice looking little car on a 61 plate, taxed and tested. It appeared on a street in May and hasn't moved since. Best case scenario its broken down and the owner cant afford to sort it. Over the ensuing 2 months its had a mirror smashed off and 2 tyres slashed so is now in a state of visual disrepair and is unroadworthy. With the length of time that has elapsed, its unroadwoethiness and visual state of disrepair it fits the criteria now as an "abandoned" car and I'm trying to get the oxygen thieves at the district council to remove it.
 
OP
OP
Beebo

Beebo

Firm and Fruity
Location
Hexleybeef
We would have been guilty of that when my father in law died. But never got caught.
His wife didn’t have a driving licence, but the car was inherited by her.
It sat on her drive for 6 months, untaxed, uninsured and doing nothing. But we definitely didn’t SORN it.
There really should be some leeway in certain situations.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Location
The Urban Fringe
I think as regards SORN and insurance, as opposed to actually driving and insurance, the powers that be traditionally give a lot of leeway in terms of elapsed time before prosecution. In Ed's case some 4 or 5 years had elapsed before they got heavy with him.

The line has to be drawn somewhere, and a couple of years is more than adequate leeway for people to trouble themselves to find out what their legal responsibilities are if they have acquired a vehicle through such an unfortunate route. The rest of us that actually drive and use our vehicles don't get any such countenance.
 
Top Bottom