Blimey, you underplayed that a bit Gavroche, you sure you haven't become too Anglicised over the years. Looks like it's been an extra on X-men movie.That is the damage done, £200 worth to be more precise. View attachment 34236
Blimey, you underplayed that a bit Gavroche, you sure you haven't become too Anglicised over the years. Looks like it's been an extra on X-men movie.That is the damage done, £200 worth to be more precise. View attachment 34236
Hang on you nobber...........You have a gift for understatement. That's not a dink that's a disgrace.
That is the damage done, £200 worth to be more precise. View attachment 34236
So are cars a special case then when it comes to damaging other people's property? All the people who sign up to the "its only a car" philosophy, would you own up if you accidentally damaged someone else's car?
What if it was someone's house, say you were clumsy with a ladder and put through a neighbours window, or bit of fence or something. "its only a house" doesn't quite cut it.
I can see both sides of "its only a car", owning a cheap banger for day to day and something nicer for the weekend. I think it depends what value (which may not simply by monetary) it has to the owner though, not what the person inflicting the damage thinks it may be worth (i.e. "its only a car" so I can take less care opening my door near it)
2820583 said:Or try a black felt tip pen first?
I think many people are making a lesser thing about it because it's a car.2820224 said:You are getting this the wrong way around. It is not that it doesn't matter because it is a car. It is the fact that many people make a greater thing about it for a car than anything else.
Political terms.2821034 said:In absolute or relative terms?