Boorish and [un?]gentlemanly, most assuredly, but we never claimed or aspired to be otherwise.
Is your argument that someone intending to be objectionable precludes anyone taking issue with that poster being objectionable?
I think that's supportable in a private context, or in the acknowledged "bearpit" forums - I'm not sure that it holds up in Café (see caveat below, however).
The problem with calling someone out is that they may already know, and they may not care what you think.
I hope I don't do you a disservice with the assumption, but from what little I know of your persona on Cyclechat, I thought that would be the case. Hope springs eternal, I suppose, and again, as this isn't a private conversation, there's a rationale that supports making the arguments in any case.
To believe otherwise is a level of self directed flattery as misguided as the very ramblings with which you took umbrage.
I'm not sure I understand the first part of that - the second, (being misguided), perhaps. I've not been back long, and Café may well be the sort of place where this kind of thing passes without comment these days.