I quite like it myself,
very light, pretty, easy on the eye and so uncorporate.
Everyone should use it. To lambast a font is just plain strange.
http://www.bbc.co.uk...gazine-11582548
What's the problem?
Its evil, pure and simple.
Marks and Spencer's typeface, Optima is designed to be only a few words together, not a block of text, it looks very very wrong when used as such, Comic Sans is the same, it is designed to be used in the Beano in comic book speech bubbles, in that setting it is right and is readable.
Yes it is now.
I find that in school it is easier for pupils to read than some other fonts. Especially those with reading difficulties. It is closer to a Primary teachers black chalkboard style.
As someone with dyspraxia I used to be seen as a pain by the disability support department at uni as i simply can not read anything written in comic sans!
I studied graphic design and we had to justify our typeface choices (font, or to spell it the British way, fount, is actually the method of producing the type) there was never a reason for using comic sans or papyrus!
If we used times, helvetica or arial we had a harder job justifying it as they are default typefaces for various programs.
Personally I prefer Gill Sans, its nice and simple typeface and is the default typeface now on my computer, everything appears in it unless a typeface has been specified.