Which bike backpack would you go for?

Discussion in 'Components, Accessories and Clothing' started by Liz Su, 6 Jan 2018.

  1. Liz Su

    Liz Su Über Member

    Good afternoon, I'm after a new pack mainly for day to day on the bike with shopping included and for days out etc, so for the bike and general purpose. Not for carrying laptops and tablets.
    I've ordered myself the Osprey momentum 32 at £55.00 but thinking about it I think I should have got the Osprey Escapist in a 32 because that suits me better. The only problems are I dislike hip pads as I dont like things round my waist and I dont like the phone pocket on the strap. So thats not ideal really either.
    Has anyone any other suggestions of a 32 L bike rucksack? I really want a bike one because the hiking ones tend to be too long in torso length for me on the bike. Thanks.
  2. Crankarm

    Crankarm Guru

    Nr Cambridge
    First off my answer is panniers. Wearing a 30+ litre rucksack on your back full of shopping as you cycle has got to be some sort of punishment bordering on masochism. Secondly if you find a rucksack is too long in the back for you it probably is. It is like wearing a pair of size 10 shoes if your feet are a size 6. Osprey do female specific rucksacks, which tend to be much shorter in the back as women have shorter backs than men, narrower shoulders and of course different upper body anatomy. Therefore the chest straps of ladies Osrepy packs are a slightly different shape to mens' packs to account for the differences in ladies and mens shapes.

    Having said all this I still think you should use panniers as carrying a heavy 30 litre rucksack on your back whilst cycling will not be a great experience and likely compromise your cycling performance and your control of your bike It will certainly make you feel very top heavy with a high centre of gravity and may also cause pains in your wrists, shoulders and back more generally.
    Liz Su likes this.
  3. OP
    Liz Su

    Liz Su Über Member

    Thanks, I've got panniers on my tourer, I'm just wanting a bag for the mountain bike and for picking up a few bits whilst out and about.
  4. vickster

    vickster Legendary Member

    Deuter have anything? I have one of their smaller ones, rarely use but doesn't sit on my hips (I am quite tall tho)
  5. OP
    Liz Su

    Liz Su Über Member

    Not that I can see.
  6. NorthernDave

    NorthernDave Never used Über Member

  7. OP
    Liz Su

    Liz Su Über Member

    Thanks but £125 is a bit too much for a rucksack.
    NorthernDave likes this.
  8. andrew_s

    andrew_s Veteran

    I don't use not-panniers often enough to justify a cycling-specific backpack, so I use my general hiking backpack (OMM Jirishanca 35).
    It's fine, so long as I don't stuff it full, which would push my head down when in the cycling position.
  9. NorthernDave

    NorthernDave Never used Über Member

    No, the RRP is a bit steep - they're good bags but even so...
    I got mine in the sale at Halfords a few years ago at 50% off.
  10. ColinJ

    ColinJ Hillfinder General

    I have a 35L rucksack which I made the mistake of using on a 4-day mini-tour. After suffering with the weight of that on my back, I put a rack on the bike when I got home! :okay:

    I still use the rucksack for local shopping trips on my singlespeed bike which no longer has a rack on it. (I tried it with a rack and mudguards but decided that I wanted that bike as light and simple as possible so I transferred them to other bikes.)

    It is actually a hiking rucksack and I didn't think that I would use the chest and waist straps but I soon found out that I needed to when the full rucksack moved as I looked over my shoulder in traffic. The change in my centre of gravity threw me off balance and almost caused an accident. Once I had adjusted the shoulder, waist and chest straps properly the rucksack was much more comfortable and I can now cycle safely when carrying heavy loads in it.

    35 L is actually quite a big bag and 32 L is only a bit smaller. I am 6' 1" tall but I have the leg length of a typical person of about 5' 10" and make up the extra height with a correspondingly longer torso. The 35 L bag is a good fit for me so I'm not surprised that you (Liz) find bags of that kind of size a bit long. Couldn't you get away with a 25 L bag instead?
    Liz Su likes this.
  11. OP
    Liz Su

    Liz Su Über Member

    Yes I could.
    I need to try a few on I think.
    ColinJ likes this.
  12. Elybazza61

    Elybazza61 Veteran

    mjr and Liz Su like this.
  13. mjr

    mjr Wanting to Keep My EU Citizenship

    I use a dare2b silicone folding rucksack for picking up a few bits (I think it's 9litres). For 35L, it's panniers.
  14. Jason

    Jason Senior Member

    Carnaby Street
    Timbuk2 classic messenger bag in a small is big enough for a 5ft 11 man, so plenty big enough for you liz, unless you are very tall.
    It squashes down when not much is being carried. Very steady on the bike and looks cool off it.
    Liz Su likes this.
  15. slowmotion

    slowmotion Quite dreadful

    lost somewhere
    I bought a Karrimor Urban 30 litre pack for about £15 in a sale. It's not ideal. The hip strap is completely redundant if you are reasonably tall. I cut it off. The zips snag....something that drives me even more bonkers every time I use them. However, the shoulder straps are pretty wide and comfortable.

    It was pretty cheap and I've used it for a couple of years. I'll get something else pretty soon. Good luck in your quest.
    Liz Su likes this.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice