I have just read this before posting and it is long winded........apologies but it's just to get a CC debate/argument going
I was driving along a narrow(ish) lane with no houses**. It was national speed limit (60). In front of me was a car doing normal/sensible speed.
We came to a sharp/blind left bend and on the right (actually on the bend) was an entrance to a large **property in its own walled grounds............the entrance included a wide driveway where people sometimes park while they walk their dog etc.
The driver in front wants to park in this drive so he slows right down before doing a VERY sharp right turn. I assume the road in front must have appeared clear to him as he just went for it.
What he didn't/couldn't see was the car coming the other way.
It was close......the oncoming driver slammed on and fortunately there was no collision.
EXTENUATING CIRCUAMSTANCES.
If the first driver hadn't of turned at that point the next opportunity to turn and come back was approx. 1 mile further on.
The oncoming driver should (probably did) "expect the unexpected" BUT...........in theory driver 1 has a right to do a right turn.........does he????
My feeling................
Driver 1 is in the wrong. If he has to go a further mile, turn around and drive another mile back.........tough s**t.
I wonder what a court would have said.
As I said..........just for debate (not for heated argument)
I was driving along a narrow(ish) lane with no houses**. It was national speed limit (60). In front of me was a car doing normal/sensible speed.
We came to a sharp/blind left bend and on the right (actually on the bend) was an entrance to a large **property in its own walled grounds............the entrance included a wide driveway where people sometimes park while they walk their dog etc.
The driver in front wants to park in this drive so he slows right down before doing a VERY sharp right turn. I assume the road in front must have appeared clear to him as he just went for it.
What he didn't/couldn't see was the car coming the other way.
It was close......the oncoming driver slammed on and fortunately there was no collision.
EXTENUATING CIRCUAMSTANCES.
If the first driver hadn't of turned at that point the next opportunity to turn and come back was approx. 1 mile further on.
The oncoming driver should (probably did) "expect the unexpected" BUT...........in theory driver 1 has a right to do a right turn.........does he????
My feeling................
Driver 1 is in the wrong. If he has to go a further mile, turn around and drive another mile back.........tough s**t.
I wonder what a court would have said.
As I said..........just for debate (not for heated argument)