cougie uk
Guru
That's not really a valid argument though, is it? They're significantly more expensive than IC vehicles while they depreciate rapidly so represent worse value for those who purchase them new.
Mine wasn't. And they're even cheaper now.
That's not really a valid argument though, is it? They're significantly more expensive than IC vehicles while they depreciate rapidly so represent worse value for those who purchase them new.
Admittedly the Torygraph, but this article makes some good points about slowing uptake of EVs..
herculean tasks.
Part of that narrative is I suspect the west has begun to realise, they simply won't be able to compete against China.
I haven't seen any sign whatsoever of any government "realising" that non-fact.Indeed - as the article alludes to, I think it's a two-front situation. On the one hand governments are realising / admitting that EVs aren't viable on a mass scale; on the other that the market share of whatever EVs are being used is looking increasingly likely to be dominated by the Chinese to the cost of domestic manufacturers in a time where conceptually many are pulling away from globalisation.
Again, while small-scale remember what happened with LPG cars? Tax breaks on fuel made them cheaper to run, people jumped on the bandwagon and had their vehicles converted at their cost.. cost of fuel rose, availability fell and now barely anyone even remembers them. I think similar will happen with electric.. although maybe with greater political backlash given the costs involved.
I haven't seen any sign whatsoever of any government "realising" that non-fact.
It seems to be your opinion thaht they aren't viable on a mass scale, but only a fairly small number share your view.
I don't think there is the remotest chance of that happening with electric.

One could argue that the pushing back of the new IC car sales ban by five years is an acknowledgement that EVs aren't as viable as initially suggested.
One could argue that if one was determined that they aren't viable.
But I think it is mainly just bringing it in line with most other governments, so that car manufacturers will not be still producing IC cars for some markets but not others.
Possibly also because it may take longer than initially thought tob get the full infrastructure in place, but if they really thought EVs wouldn't be viable for the masses, then they would not just be delaying it by 5 years.

One could argue that the pushing back of the new IC car sales ban by five years is an acknowledgement that EVs aren't as viable as initially suggested.
In short / direct terms at least I have no dog in this fight as it'll be a long time before any EVs fall to the price that I'd be happy to spend on a utility vehicle, and I suspect even longer (if ever) before such accessible offerings represent a preferable alternative to something with an IC powertrain.
In the meantime I'm happy to watch the situation from the sidelines; maybe I'll be proven correct, maybe not. Time will tell
...
Of course you might be correct that the 5 year delay might simply be due to limitations in infrastructure provision.
I'm not buying a car at all as what I have currently does the job. Were I replacing it I doubt I'd go electric as anything currently on the market would be outside my budget for a beater, while for the money I'd have to pay for an EV there are IC cars I'd rather have..But you do have a dog. You're not trying the electric car as you have an ice already.
If you had an EV you'd be surprised at how easy they are to live with.
Given the state of things that wouldn't surprise me. As for the relevance of the cutoff, I guess we'll have to wait and seeIt was nothing to do with infrastructure, it was a response by a desperate government to unexpectedly not losing a byelection in Uxbridge apparently on an anti-ULEZ campaign, hence doubling down on anti-environmental policies. Bear in mind that manufacturers are still required to sell a certain % of EVs. Ultimately, the way technology and global markets are going, the 2035 cut-off will be pretty irrelevant by then anyway.

I'm not buying a car at all as what I have currently does the job. Were I replacing it I doubt I'd go electric as anything currently on the market would be outside my budget for a beater, while for the money I'd have to pay for an EV there are IC cars I'd rather have..
Ease of "living with it" isn't really something I'd considered as my reservations are typically rooted elsewhere. However, now you mention it I'd be interested to hear your suggestions for a charging regime considering I live on a busy A-road with no parking on-or-off-street at the house, and typically park in a variety of public / on-street locations away from the property...
Given the state of things that wouldn't surprise me. As for the relevance of the cutoff, I guess we'll have to wait and see
I'd there's no place to charge at home you'll have to charge at your destination. It'll cost you more though sadly.
The cut off for combustion cars will happen. The vauxhall plant at Ellesmere Port has made it's last ICE car and can only make EVs from now on.
Production line changes cost millions and take years to plan in so it's not something you do just on the whim of a Government minister.
