Will it be there when the owner gets back? Part 3

[ianrauk]

Well?

 

[fossyant]

Yep. You couldn't pay me to ride that.

 

[ColinJ]

Well, the bike stand will be!

 

[Deleted member 35268]

Yes, it's nasty

 

[si_c]

Wouldn't want to ride it, let alone carry it.

 

[Spiderweb]

A thief would have to carry it and those bike weigh as much as a small car!

 

[fossyant]

I had a quick go of a mates son's bike that I got working again for them. Bloody awful. Like riding something with disconnected steering and wheels. Enough to put anyone off cycling.

 

[Drago]

if a passing blacksmith is in need of a new anvil...

 

[greekonabike]

No, because it's almost as bad as an Ammaco Colorado.

GOAB

 

[Moodyman]

Bike thieves are often not cyclists and with it wearing a familiar name (Dunlop) I reckon it could be deemed a worthy target.

 

[Cycleops]

I read that Sports Direct recently sold the Dunlop brand to a Japanese company for £137m, don't know if includes the bike brand but another reason (as if you needed one) not to buy one.

 

[deptfordmarmoset]

There's obviously something about those stands which hinders clear thinking. It was safer when those Christmas tree sellers took them over - at least you could hide your bike then...

 

[HLaB]

If a potential thief has any taste/ sense it'll still be there This confirms thou the majority of scrotes don't have the latter

 

[Shut Up Legs]

Yes, I'm sure the building will still be there when its owner gets back.