U
User169
Guest
Wind is awful and there's a lot of it here.
Makes no difference, power is power! xxxW uphill is no different to xxxW into a headwind, or even xxxW with a tailwind. The only difference is you will go at different speeds for your xxxW, but the amount of work is the same!
Wind is awful and there's a lot of it here.
Er...That's not strictly true. If I may sully the thread with physics (sorry), work is power multiplied by time. A head wind will slow you down so you'll take longer, hence have to expend more work to travel the same distance.
That's not strictly true. If I may sully the thread with physics (sorry), work is power multiplied by time. A head wind will slow you down so you'll take longer, hence have to expend more work to travel the same distance.
Er...
250w up a ave 5% gradient = 5m 45s per mile give or take.
250w in to a 25mph head wind = 5m 30s per mile give or take.
Rule 5
<more physics, feel free to look away now>
And freewheeling on the descent afterwards? You need to factor in the gain in gravitational potential energy - which is returned on the desecent - "what goes up must come down". (Yes, you can pedal too, but as wind resistance increases as the square of the velocity means you'll get much less benefit than you expect. Put simply, the amount of energy used to move one metre increases as the square of the velocity difference between you and the surrounding air. This is also the reason why you don't get as much benefit from a tail wind than you might expect.)