Terminator
New Member
That's true. The trouble is that it also tells them that we should be in them at all times.
That's because half of them dont know the highway code or choose to ignore it.
Fek 'em.If they dont like it tough titty.
That's true. The trouble is that it also tells them that we should be in them at all times.
That's true. The trouble is that it also tells them that we should be in them at all times.
magnatom said:The problem is that roads were never designed with cycle lanes in mind. Adding them as an afterthought very rarely works, although councils feel obliged due to cycling targets. Nice wide cycle lanes and nice wide roads would be great, but in practice I can't ever see it happening. That's why I would want to scrap them completely. It would resolve any confusion associated with them.
We already have great cycle lanes, they're called roads!
No, round here, big green bus lanes, thinner red cycle lanesBentMikey said:Gambatte, how come your cycle lanes are red, or do you mean bus lanes?
BentMikey said:Wow, that's opposite to London.
Uncle Phil said:
yeah i know which bit you mean. When you get to the end of mowbray street, the bit where corporation street joins from your right is the bit where the new bridges are, you then go round to your left onto the completely new bit of road - whereas before you would have gone down nursery street, but you can't go down nursery street now can you? I wonder what they're going to do with what was nursery street, and whether it's eventually going to go the other way?gambatte said:Its all that area, the bit you mentioned is one of the bits I use to go to & through Attercliffe from Mowbray Street, missing out Nursery Street.
gambatte said:Found coming into town was fun last Monday. Signs saying ‘Buses, Taxis and access only’ to go under the Wicker arches, thro’ traffic/ city centre diverted to the right. No one was going right. Reinforces the view that car drivers are herd animals?