An important part of his piece -
'But he revealed that the evidence wasn’t all one way.
While 75 per cent of the total money bet at William Hill had gone on Remain, he said: “In terms of the actual numbers of bets made it’s the other way round: 75 per cent of bets on Leave and 25 per cent on Remain.”
He admitted: “At the back of my mind, there is the possibility that the high percentage of individual bets on Leave could be an indicator that we got it wrong.'
Are you a secret agent for the bookies? Because whichever way it goes now, the "bookies" predicted it. If it's remain, then the odds were right. If it's leave, then the number of bets places was right.
If we are going to place our faith in the bookies, we have to do by odds, because it was odds that correctly predicted the recent elections that polls got so badly wrong. If we are going to look at number of bets placed, can you produce those figures for the previous votes?