Zwift Chat

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Legs

usually riding on Zwift...
Location
Staffordshire
The first 13km were pretty much flat, and for that section I did 291 watts (3.73w/kg), and Lee did 290 watts (4.53w/kg) and he was 44 seconds ahead. So I wonder if this was simply an advantage of 5cm height difference?
No, there is definitely a component of the drag coefficient which is related to weight, so even on the flat bits Lee would have the advantage even if he weren't a short-arse.
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Bike and wheel choice ? 🤷‍♂️ I did ask if we should all have the basic set up as it makes a difference
I had the fastest set up you could get for the flat so that wouldn't be any part of an explanation of why you were faster
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
No, there is definitely a component of the drag coefficient which is related to weight, so even on the flat bits Lee would have the advantage even if he weren't a short-arse.
Yeah, just did a bit of digging on this - good article here that backs up what you're saying - https://zwiftinsider.com/rider-weight-speed/. Form the article:

Effect of Rider Weight on Flat Roads
Flat tests were completed over two laps of the Tempus Fugit route.

Test Results
  • 82kg @ 300 watts: 52 minutes, 17 seconds (39.7kph)
  • 75kg @ 300 watts: 51 minutes, 26 seconds (40.4kph) – 51 seconds faster
Flat Test Observations
While some Zwifters like to say “it’s all about pure watts on flat roads,” it’s not that simple. Weight does affect your speed on the flats in Zwift, since it changes your computed CdA. Or to put it another way: two riders of the same height but different weights will have different CdA values in Zwift, meaning the heavier rider will need to push more watts to keep up with the lighter rider, who is encountering less (virtual) air resistance.
 

Peter Salt

Bittersweet
Location
Yorkshire, UK
@Girafitti, on the W vs. W/kg debate: I think that the differences for the top guys yesterday were minimal but if you look at the difference between me and @steverob it was massive.

Steve is 97.1kg and did 249W - that's 2.57 W/kg. Did the course in 42:20
I'm 71.5kg and did 211W - that's 2.95 W/kg. Did the course in 42:48 - almost 30s behind Steve.

The KOM was only 1.9km and I was around 15s quicker than Steve on that section.

So yeah, definitely looks like pure watts is king on a flat TT.

@Spartak I think I might just sign up for that hill climb that you posted.
 
Last edited:

Joffey

Big Dosser
Location
Yorkshire
On the W vs. W/kg debate: I think that the differences for the top guys yesterday were minimal but if you look at the difference between me and @steverob it was massive.

Steve is 97.1kg and did 249W - that's 2.57 W/kg. Did the course in 42:20
I'm 71.5kg and did 211W - that's 2.95 W/kg. Did the course in 42:48 - almost 30s behind Steve.

The KOM was only 1.9km and I was around 15s quicker than Steve.

So yeah, definitely looks like pure watts is king on a flat TT.

@Spartak I think I might just do that hill climb that you posted.

Is Steve shorter than you?
 

Aleman

Knees are FUBAR but I don't like to mention it
Location
Blackpool UK
Based on numbers last night I can't be far off being upgraded now by ZP, so I might as well go onto the B rota (plus we have a full CCC rota).
Splitter!!! :thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown::thumbsdown:
 

Legs

usually riding on Zwift...
Location
Staffordshire
I'm tall (6'3") which penalises me, and I didn't deploy my power evenly, because I wanted to crush Michael's spirit with a fast start!
But one other thing to note would be the equipment difference.
...and both Paul and Michael were using the DT Swiss Disc wheelset, which is 17.5s faster over 50 minutes (~12s faster over this course) than the Zipp 808s (which are the best I've got).
 
Top Bottom