So, we replace a thousand year old proven and globally respected justice system with privately owned video footage and lynching mobs.
Yay for progress!
Facepalm.
Just an advance on "They said, I said", which has been the mainstay of the system. Unless you had money in the olden days.So, we replace a thousand year old proven and globally respected justice system with privately owned video footage and lynching mobs.
Yay for progress!
Facepalm.
The bankers are poor then!Poverty begets crime, which confuses those who would prefer it be a genetic or racial trait.
It's not something the right wing tend to like to hear either.
The bankers are poor then!
Caught a solicitor shoplifting, with a purpose made coat. And he didn't appear to be poor.
Is poverty a relative thing?
Give me a pitchforkSo, we replace a thousand year old proven and globally respected justice system with privately owned video footage and lynching mobs.
Yay for progress!
Facepalm.
He must be a good runner.
I spoke to somebody earlier who had a different perspective on the video, that may render this entire discussion pointless. She reckoned that the incident began earlier than shown on the video. The cyclist had had some sort of run in with the pedestrian, where she waved a finger, and he threatened to to push her off. The video apparently starts with him having almost caught her up, which is why she says 'please don't push me off'.
Indeed, nothing justifies his assault.There's been way too much analysis here. The bloke was a violent dick. End of.
Ooh yes. Can I go with "is deeply remorseful and has turned his life around since the incident and is now actively seeking work."
That's simply not true. Men are about twice as likely as women to be the victims of violent crimes.Absolutely not, the crime is worthy of greater repulsion because it is male on female violence. A man is far more likely to attack someone if they are female, than male.