Or not? CC may not the only place where road casualty stats are bent to feed agendas. Listen from 13:40 on iPlayer Speculating - did the Sun: 1) Employ such a clueless string of reporters, sub-editors and editors that they could publish such rubbish without checking? 2) Knew it was rubbish but it was such a good story published it anyway 3) Published because it fed the Murdoch agenda of making money by pleasing some of its major supporters and advertisers (aka the motoring lobby) 4) Or ... Strangely I haven't had the Sun 'facts' quoted back to me yet. Or does that say something about the reading habits of my friends and colleagues?