Im 5ft 10 and a 17" 29er frame just about fits - stand over height is right on the limit
Should have had a 15" one really
Interesting. Like you, I plan on using it to commute on it, as well as single-track.
Thanks for the advice all.
Im 5ft 10 and a 17" 29er frame just about fits - stand over height is right on the limit
Should have had a 15" one really
The Large Boardman is quite similar in dimensions to the Large Kinesis ff29, a spec page I'm used to looking at. You could almost certainly tweak things like bars, stem and stack height (Boardman seems to have about 2cm of adjustment maybe more). It's a lovely bike but I'm partial to the Boardmans.
The issue I would have with using one for dual purposes is that the setup I'd want for road riding, tyres, stem length, bars, stack height would be quite different to what I'd want off-road. On road I'd like the bike to be longer and lower and off-road shorter and higher. Personally I think it's a circle you won't square, you'll have to compromise.
if you had the money you could get a separate set of wheels for off road and one wheel set for roadI can't imagine changing tyres and stem would take too long. I could live with half an hour of adjustments before taking it off-road every other weekend (which is what I'm likely to be doing) . If that's all that was needed.
Young Ed makes a good suggestion but in answer to your earlier question, a smaller frame just puts you more upright and combined with a slacker head angle on the mtn bike will just make it all feel a bit slower on the road, quite different to a road bike. Going for a more stretched ride on a larger frame will make it more difficult to move the bike around off road, that's your main compromise. Within either of those two scenarios you have the ability to fine tune the setup.I can't imagine changing tyres and stem would take too long. I could live with half an hour of adjustments before taking it off-road every other weekend (which is what I'm likely to be doing) . If that's all that was needed.
Young Ed makes a good suggestion but in answer to your earlier question, a smaller frame just puts you more upright and combined with a slacker head angle on the mtn bike will just make it all feel a bit slower on the road, quite different to a road bike. Going for a more stretched ride on a larger frame will make it more difficult to move the bike around off road, that's your main compromise. Within either of those two scenarios you have the ability to fine tune the setup.
If I was going to do a lot of mixed trail riding on choppy routes I'd want the smaller frame whereas fast flowing stuff I could probably get away with a bigger frame. There is no hard and fast though, practically you might find one size just fits and the other feels wrong, this is all just theoretical.
I wasn't really coming down in any direction because I think that's ultimately your call, just trying to present as many sides of your options as possible.Appreciate all of your advise. You've obviously got a fair amount of experience and knowledge on the matter.
I'm not quite sure what you're ultimately suggesting though:
- Roll with a smaller 29er frame, with better components, and make adjustments as and when
- Compromise on the finishing kit, in favour of a 29er frame that is a more suitable fit
- Look at a more dual-sport focused bikes
When I bought my Boardman from Halfords they set it up on a turbo for me so I could get the feel of "riding" it. It's not leaving the shop so in theory no reason why they wouldn't do this for you. I suppose it depends on how helpful they feel like being!