84 year old lady needs new bike: suggestions please

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Rohloff_Brompton_Rider

Formerly just_fixed
Liked the post because I love my single speed Paper Bike :smile:
However, it's not suitable for an older lady with no mechanical support. I am 51 :smile: can manage the 3 stone bike no problems, but I guess an older lady could find it a challenge.
There are geared ones available (hub gears) but the problem would be in case of a flat: I had to learn how to fix an eventual puncture without removing the wheels, as the hub gears and brakes make it really difficult.
Best luck in finding a suitable bike for the formidable lady rider, wish I had the same stamina!
Interesting as I'm seriously thinking of one of these as a perfect commuter bike I could leave outside the wards. They hire them in Manchester so I'm going to get one for 24 hours and see what they're like in the hills of rossendale, the gearing seems ok at 31". I'm just worried about the weight and internal brakes being capable on three or four mile down hill sections and over heating / brake fade.
 

Dave 123

Legendary Member
It's fantastic that she is still able to ride at that frequency at that age, and that her old man is a gorilla who can wreck a bike with a bit of rope!

My in laws are nearly 70. My MiL has given up already!

Pashley I say.
 

Globalti

Legendary Member
The problem with step-through frames is their inherent weakness; there's no top tube to brace the frame so it will be wanting to fold up. This means the tubing has to be stronger, which, in the case of cheap tubing, means thicker and heavier. A proper two triangle frame is a much stronger structure and can be lighter and better to ride.
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
The problem with step-through frames is their inherent weakness; there's no top tube to brace the frame so it will be wanting to fold up. This means the tubing has to be stronger, which, in the case of cheap tubing, means thicker and heavier. A proper two triangle frame is a much stronger structure and can be lighter and better to ride.

well ok, that's true so far as it goes, but this is for a rather elderly lady who we are given to understand needs a lady's frame as she's possibly not as supple as she was 50 years ago .
 
OP
OP
MikeG

MikeG

Guru
Location
Suffolk
I...... this is for a rather elderly lady who we are given to understand needs a lady's frame as she's possibly not as supple as she was 50 years ago .

Exactly. Trying to throw your leg over a saddle in your 80's is going to end in failure sooner or later.
 

Pat "5mph"

A kilogrammicaly challenged woman
Moderator
Location
Glasgow
Interesting as I'm seriously thinking of one of these as a perfect commuter bike I could leave outside the wards. They hire them in Manchester so I'm going to get one for 24 hours and see what they're like in the hills of rossendale, the gearing seems ok at 31". I'm just worried about the weight and internal brakes being capable on three or four mile down hill sections and over heating / brake fade.
Sorry for the late reply.
The paper bike is indeed the perfect commuter if the commute is not too hilly. I've got the single speed one, can do short steep hills ok, no doubt the geared version is much better.
Good points of this bike: always ready, just pump up your tyres once a week. Never needs cleaning, chain can be left undisturbed for months riding in torrential rain, brakes perform impeccably in any weather, no need to change pads till the 10.000 mile mark - according to the manufacturer, Nick, whom I met a couple of times.
No worries about failing batteries, the dynamos are adequate for an urban commute - you may want to supplement them if riding unlit paths.
Once the balloon tyres start to roll, it takes minimal effort to keep it going, kept up with @Mad Doug Biker on his racer once, on a very flat cycle path I must admit :shy:
The bike is also a a focal point of interest if you want to pull another cyclist :laugh:
Bad points:
Mine weights 3 stone, it is though an earlier model, one of the first 3 built. Maybe the newer ones are lighter.
Mine has no rack eyelets, you can however easily fit a basket. Again, newer models may differ.
It is very prone to rust. Repairs and cable changes are difficult: I crashed on it, broke the rear mudguard fixing, got a new one from Nick, but the mechanic had a hard time removing the broken rusted fitting, eventually had to saw it off.
Inner tube changes at the roadside are impossible, however I never had a flat using the bike almost every day for the potholed commute since last summer.
It rattles :smile:
I understand a brand new one costs in excess of a thousand pounds - got mine ex demonstration model from the local bike station for 300.
If you are willing to spend that kind of money for the perfect commuter, I am sure another more flexible and lighter bike with hub gears, chain guard, hub brakes and dynamos could be found.
Hope this has helped :hello:
 
OP
OP
MikeG

MikeG

Guru
Location
Suffolk
Which rather misses the point that my MIL wants a bike similar to her existing one, with 700 diameter wheels.
 

young Ed

Veteran
maybe i need this for my future ironman triathlon! plus a wicker basket on the front :biggrin:
http://flyingpigeon-la.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/toer_populair_t3.jpg
toer_populair_t3.jpg

proper job with a bottle dynamo and hub brakes front and rear! :biggrin:
Cheers Ed
 
Top Bottom