I think the OP is confusing big brands with visible brands. Adidas, Nike etc spend massive amounts on advertising and are some of the best-known brands in the world beccause everybody can own something by them.
Only a very tiny minority of the world's population has enough disposable income to blow a month or two worth of salary on a bicycle so why would those mass-market brands want to waste money on something that is unattainable to 99% of the world?
Quote from Phill Mickleson, 'Tiger plays really well for someone who uses crap golf clubs" nike...
Some of this might be down to perceived weaknesses in the existing golf market when Nike decided to enter. Not that I know anything about golf, then or now.Fair point. But why did Nike get into making, marketing and selling golf clubs? That is the parallel I'm seeking to draw. Set of clubs are similar price to a bike. Similar type of customer.
Maybe they see clubs as a leader to establish a "Nike Golf" brand on which to sell their golf clothing. Or maybe the market for cycling clothing is too small compared to golfing clothing so it's not worth establishing a Nike Cycling brand. After all, you can wear a Nike Golf polo shirt down the pub......
The cycling market seems to be expanding quickly but no really big player has jumped in. So how long before someone like Adidas starts doing (and doing really well) bikes?
[Subconscious] brand snobbery is a big factor in the eye of the beholder... why else would brand marketing exist?Too much brand snobbery in cycling for people to buy a mass market bike - nearest is probably Carrera from Halfords - I think they are decent bikes but they always seem to get slated.
I knowAs a golfer as well as cyclist, and someone who followed Tiger's career very closely, do not make the mistake in thinking Tiger played with actual Nike clubs. They were hand made, by a specialist, rumoured to be exact replicas of his favourite Mizuno blades, then had a Nike badge stuck on them for marketing purposes.
If you want to play with the same clubs as he did, think high end Mizuno. I think Phil would have known that, I imagine he is in the same position :-)
Enough argyle at garmin /cannondale without anymoreDon't you dare mention Golf in a cycling forum......
Fair point. But why did Nike get into making, marketing and selling golf clubs? That is the parallel I'm seeking to draw. Set of clubs are similar price to a bike. Similar type of customer.
Maybe they see clubs as a leader to establish a "Nike Golf" brand on which to sell their golf clothing. Or maybe the market for cycling clothing is too small compared to golfing clothing so it's not worth establishing a Nike Cycling brand. After all, you can wear a Nike Golf polo shirt down the pub......