TSRGD said:Where no stop line has been provided in conjunction with light signals or the stop line is
not visible, references in relation to those signals to the “stop line” are
(a) in a case where the sign shown in diagram 7011 ["when red light shows, wait here], 7011.1 or 7027 [similar] is placed in conjunction with the light signals, to be treated as references to that sign; and
(b) in any other case, to be treated as references to the post or other structure on which the primary signals are mounted.
Yep, I would stop at that red.Hawk said:In other words, lights without a stop line are still a compulsory traffic control
Well given that a road bike can easily reach speeds of 20 to 30 mph I would have thought this was down right dangerous.
Well given that a road bike can easily reach speeds of 20 to 30 mph I would have thought this was down right dangerous.
Well done you, but I guess some peds may not be expecting a cycle to pass when the green man shows and some cyclists may not always be as careful/observant/knowledgeable as you and they may just see the lane as a filter.User said:Why? I can reach speeds of 20 to 30mph, but I've never managed to hit a pedestrian crossing the road.
It would for me Paul cus I would just stop at the red but I wonder if everyone would, then in an accident make some claim that there was no stop line in the cycle lane and was therefore encouraged to filter.User said:Fair point, but there's no reason why that setup couldn't work well.