GrasB said:porkypete, I use a Campag Centura groupset where the 13-29 is a standard cassette.
MacB, or maybe not... my 52/13 gives me a slightly lower ratio than 46/11, however the 13-29 cassette actually gives me a nicer set of ratios to ride on than a 11-28 as it gives me an extra gear in the 90-60" gear range that I normally ride in.
MacB said:wouldn't disagree that it's each to their own but you clearly know your gearing and what works for you. I actually think a 13-29 cassette is pretty good but thought these were Campag only? I was looking at running a 29/44 and 12-27 cassette as opposed to my existing 30/42/52 and 12-26. I'd have a top of 97 inches so losing a 105 and 114 inch gear and I'd gain a bit at the bottom. A 97 inch gear would give me 30mph at 100rpm, that's all I need. I've even looked at just running 1x9, probably 11-34 on a 40t ring.
Whatever I look at I feel I get better options with a smaller large ring than otherwise.
AlanW said:On my Audax bike I have a 10sp 12/23 cassette and a 28/39/52 triple up front.
No big gaps, so you can a keep a nice smooth cadence going......why have a compact?
Yes, all Shimano stockist, us included will be able to get 28t road cassette in 10 Speedporkypete said:Hi Paul
Are you selling the 28T cassettes in your shop?
I've just butchered a couple of HG50 cassettes to build a 9 speed 12-30T
Not tried it out yet, because of the ice. But ramps don't line up so a little concerned as to how well it will shift.
Tynan said:know nothing about gearing other than riding with them but hasn't the introduction of 10 and now 11 speed casettes reduse the need for triples? or is the closer gearing all good?
For me today a compact is actually better than a triple setup right now, especially as I've always found double shifting natural... but that doesn't mean another person will come along and take the opposing view. The interesting thing is my current 10sp compact setup gives me 1 more sequential step across the same gear range as my old 8sp triple setup, the starting point. The compact setup is actually using a cassette I didn't like on a triple setup due to annoying ratio holes & the chainrings being in the 'wrong place'. It's a personal thing & I'd not say one way is right or wrong, I just know which works for me.Paul_Smith SRCC said:Triple chainsets are for many more about increasing the overall range, more often than not increasing the low ratios available, where as increasing the sprocket numbers is for many more about reducing the size differences between each gear.
NickM said:Well that tortuous method won't work unless you go everywhere flat out...
GrasB said:For me today a compact is actually better than a triple setup right now, especially as I've always found double shifting natural... but that doesn't mean another person will come along and take the opposing view. The interesting thing is my current 10sp compact setup gives me 1 more sequential step across the same gear range as my old 8sp triple setup, the starting point. The compact setup is actually using a cassette I didn't like on a triple setup due to annoying ratio holes & the chainrings being in the 'wrong place'. It's a personal thing & I'd not say one way is right or wrong, I just know which works for me.
There's always one with a mouth bigger than theirs.jimboalee said:There's always one who doesn't engage their brain.
Why would you want to go up every hill flat out, with no gear in reserve?jimboalee said:If your legs can produce the power to ride at 27 mph on the flat FOR A FEW MINUTES, they'll be able to produce the same power up a hill FOR A FEW MINUTES...
I said "How fast CAN you ride on the flat?", not "How fast DO you ride on the flat?"