OP
OP
Deleted member 35268
Guest
I better cancel my order for a thousand units then.
Snap. Bomb proof from my perspective. Every bike in the fleet has the fitting to run this one. I think we have six of them (just in case).
I feel that the greater the visibility of a cyclist the better. However, we have to keep it practical.
I would question the flashing mode of an amber light. You would not want a vehicle pulling out in front of you, thinking that your intention (indication) was to turn at the junction. Could end up being a tricky situation to argue in the event of that happening,
It's actually difficult to argue against red Fibre Flares mounted on the back of a post or stay IIRC. The ones I've seen weren't offensively bright, they're a steady light, the rider can usually see they're working and they're a nice big illuminated area.I'm sure some sourpusses think that they represent an evil conspiracy against cyclists, and that by using them I am a traitor to cyclists everywhere, or something like that. But I rather like them.
At night, I'm not entirely sure how a motorist who has missed my two front lights or my two rear lights (with side emitting elements to them) will be any more likely to see me wearing a yellow top. He/she has to look for me first. I was by chance wearing a noteworthy cycling top today with two Hope 1 front lights and a bl**dy cyclist didn't see me!!!I believe Hi Viz does work at doing the job it was designed for in respect of being a very visible type of safety clothing. I wear it all the time, including hi viz ankle bands. At the moment, (in the absence of legislation) it is up to the individual what they wear of course, be it a cycle helmet, hi viz. clothing etc.
With the increasing interest in cycling, sadly and inevitably I believe we will see an increase in cycle casualties on our roads. I also believe that eventually certain aspects of cycle wear will become mandatory. The cycle helmet being top of the list.