If a female had given the hand signal for that I think he may have pulled over for other reasonsWhat a tosser. Have to wonder if his reaction would have been the same towards a female cyclist...

If a female had given the hand signal for that I think he may have pulled over for other reasonsWhat a tosser. Have to wonder if his reaction would have been the same towards a female cyclist...
But the cyclist didn't stick up for himself. He called the angry man a w*****, then when confronted backed right down. In terms of learned behaviour the angry man believes himself the victor, and the cyclist the victim. Many others viewing the same footage would agree.
By all means, stick up for yourself, but if your behaviour itself is likely to lead to conflict that you find unpalatable, isn't it best simply to claim the moral high ground in your own head and carry on with your life?
My advice is to avoid confrontation. You can argue against that all day long. Your choice. If you're prepared to deal with what happens next then good for you, carry on. If you think you can educate people like our angry chap in the clip by the power of hand signals, feel free to do so.The other side of the learned behaviour is that a man breaks the law and drives in a potentially life threatening manner (punishment pass) and learns absolutely nothing other than that it's perfectly alright to do so.
Besides, the cyclist never even called the guy a w***** (according to his testimony) He waved to the guy in a non threatening manner and the guy completely misinterpreted his actions. The driver in this case is a bully, and IMO it's perfectly fine to call them out.
Whether he called him a w***** or not, the driver's actions are completely unjustified.
My advice is to avoid confrontation. You can argue against that all day long. Your choice. If you're prepared to deal with what happens next then good for you, carry on. If you think you can educate people like our angry chap in the clip by the power of hand signals, feel free to do so.
Nowhere have I justified the driver's actions. I've just suggested they aren't unexpected. There's a huge difference, I look forward to a video clip where you or any other cyclist bawls and shouts corrective advice to another road user and they react by thanking you or otherwise indicating that they accept your advice with good grace.
Sensible advice* seems to be
Do not start a confrontation with another human being in any situation unless you are supremely confident that your own fight or flight skills could carry the day when they don't back down and push becomes shove or worse.
Only square up to a bully when you are sure you can/will win and you have no other choice. Because it will get messy, even if you are in the right. hurt someone in self-defence and your own behaviour will be put under the microscope with negative consequences.
Commenting on a drivers skillz or lack thereof, or even their outright law-breaking, by way of your words or gesticulations or gesture, is confrontational and escalatory. You'd get a more positive response from most drivers if you critiqued their performance in the sack rather than behind the wheel. Don't do it. Restrict yourself to a resigned grimace and an imperceptible shake of the head.
If you use a headcam then don't get mad get even. Stay calm, keep the moral high ground, ensure your own behaviour is beyond reproach, before during and after, record the nobber being a nobber and report it to the police.
*which I reserve the right not to heed.