crazyjoe101
New Member
- Location
- London
This is why I try my best not to confront drivers. What a d***.
Last edited:
This is why I try my best not to confront drivers. What a dick.
Yep. There's never going to be a GOOD outcome to 'remonstrating the driver', so just don't bother.
If that's his level of judgement, I think the army would be better off without him.
IMO a driver who’s completed IAM training can be held to a higher competence than someone who’s just passed their test. Basically they’ve been trained to a higher level, they should be operating on a higher level.
In the same way. A soldiers been trained how to fight, been trained when it’s appropriate to engage in combat and when it’s not.
Seeing as he’s not shown this control and brought disrepute to his profession, would the army just say “it’s been dealt with by a civilian court” or is he likely to face further sanctions within his professional career?
Any monetary fine is ridiculous, they should remove a persons ability to drive. Either impound the vehicle used or suspend the driver. (or both)
Airborne Gunners!! Boris, your story bought some great memories flooding back. I served with their predecessors in Aldershot. They didn't like 'hats' either and you didn't get to be a BSM unless you were good at fighting!Some many years ago, I was serving as a civilian supporting an element of 7 RHA, a unit with all the swagger and pride one associates with their beret.
A junior rank made a cheeky comment during roll call and the BSM floored him with a single punch. They were an unruly and slightly mad group.
Judge Michael Mettyear (left) arriving at Hull Crown Court, yesterday.In this regard, and from his other comments, the judge seems both sensible and enlightened where cyclists and motorists are concerned.