Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
Those are most excellent benefits. Coincidentally they also apply to cycling, so if the public wouldn't mind funding my N+1 habit I'd be most grateful.
Those are most excellent benefits. Coincidentally they also apply to cycling, so if the public wouldn't mind funding my N+1 habit I'd be most grateful.
asking a question is now "an attitude"?It's attitudes like that that led to public transport being privatised, so now it costs a lot more for a family to use public transport than it does to use their own car. It's not going well - you may have noticed.
asking a question is now "an attitude"?
Considering that cycling brings much the same benefits, then why is cycle use not being championed for subsidising from the public purse? Surely that's a perfectly reasonable question?
A bit off topic but it's about lazy drivers who wont walk. I was in the local cemetery on Tuesday when i saw two old dodderers actually driving down a narrow path in between the graves to get right up to a grave. The car was wider than the path so it left deep tread marks along the way.
Lazy or disabled?
Slightly surprised that the path wasn't wide enough. In my all too recent experience, the hearse has to be able to get round to graves in the most distant bits of the graveyard. I do see completely able-bodied people driving their cars fairly short distances to graves though.A bit off topic but it's about lazy drivers who wont walk. I was in the local cemetery on Tuesday when i saw two old dodderers actually driving down a narrow path in between the graves to get right up to a grave. The car was wider than the path so it left deep tread marks along the way.