Where a cyclist is involved in a collision with a vehicle, they are talking about amending the law so that the vehicle is automatically assumed guilty of being at fault.
Am I the only one who thinks this is an incredibly bad idea? We all know that there are bad drivers, but equally there are also bad cyclists and it isn't always the drivers fault.
I don't really think a "guilty until proven innocent" assumption is going to help matters. If anything, it'll just drive lead to even more animosity between drivers and cyclists.
Thoughts?..
Am I the only one who thinks this is an incredibly bad idea? We all know that there are bad drivers, but equally there are also bad cyclists and it isn't always the drivers fault.
I don't really think a "guilty until proven innocent" assumption is going to help matters. If anything, it'll just drive lead to even more animosity between drivers and cyclists.
Thoughts?..