Well at least you've remembered who you are. In a word, no. Looks too much hassle, easy enough in a pan. Once it's cooked, stir in the sauce, saves another pan to was up as well.I didn't know it could be done until I just read a google thingy.
I have always done it in the pan but the micro looks to be a good method.
I didn't know it could be done until I just read a google thingy.
I have always done it in the pan but the micro looks to be a good method.
- Ignore packet instructions.
- Put pasta in a deep Pyrex dish with a lid.
- Submerge the pasta with boiling water to a depth of 5cm leaving at least 5cm of freeboard above the water level.
- Simmer in the microwave on medium power for 10 minutes (±to taste).
- Drain and serve at table in the Pyrex dish. No saucepans to wash up.
- Ignore packet instructions.
- Put pasta in a deep Pyrex dish with a lid.
- Submerge the pasta with boiling water to a depth of 5cm leaving at least 5cm of freeboard above the water level.
- Simmer in the microwave on medium power for 10 minutes (±to taste).
- Drain and serve at table in the Pyrex dish. No saucepans to wash up.
...and you've boiled a kettle, more energy used, can't see the point.You have exactly the same amount of washing up - one pyrex bowl as opposed to one saucepan surely?
Try 20 minutes on full powerCan you burn heretics in a microwave?
Only if your house rules permit serving from saucepans at table.You have exactly the same amount of washing up - one pyrex bowl as opposed to one saucepan surely?
Know your pasta, know your microwave, measure accurately, experiment with timing, implement your results. How else does one cook?![]()
The above are a recipe for overcooked/undercooked pasta: how do you check if it's ready?
There is also the potential of a mega boiling water incident imo.
Just don't do it!
properly!Know your pasta, know your microwave, measure accurately, experiment with timing, implement your results. How else does one cook?![]()