Well at least you've remembered who you are. In a word, no. Looks too much hassle, easy enough in a pan. Once it's cooked, stir in the sauce, saves another pan to was up as well.I didn't know it could be done until I just read a google thingy.
I have always done it in the pan but the micro looks to be a good method.
I didn't know it could be done until I just read a google thingy.
I have always done it in the pan but the micro looks to be a good method.
- Ignore packet instructions.
- Put pasta in a deep Pyrex dish with a lid.
- Submerge the pasta with boiling water to a depth of 5cm leaving at least 5cm of freeboard above the water level.
- Simmer in the microwave on medium power for 10 minutes (±to taste).
- Drain and serve at table in the Pyrex dish. No saucepans to wash up.
- Ignore packet instructions.
- Put pasta in a deep Pyrex dish with a lid.
- Submerge the pasta with boiling water to a depth of 5cm leaving at least 5cm of freeboard above the water level.
- Simmer in the microwave on medium power for 10 minutes (±to taste).
- Drain and serve at table in the Pyrex dish. No saucepans to wash up.
...and you've boiled a kettle, more energy used, can't see the point.You have exactly the same amount of washing up - one pyrex bowl as opposed to one saucepan surely?
Try 20 minutes on full powerCan you burn heretics in a microwave?
Only if your house rules permit serving from saucepans at table.You have exactly the same amount of washing up - one pyrex bowl as opposed to one saucepan surely?
Know your pasta, know your microwave, measure accurately, experiment with timing, implement your results. How else does one cook?
The above are a recipe for overcooked/undercooked pasta: how do you check if it's ready?
There is also the potential of a mega boiling water incident imo.
Just don't do it!
properly!Know your pasta, know your microwave, measure accurately, experiment with timing, implement your results. How else does one cook?