Not talking about commuting here. I could think of a few reasons off the top of my head regarding pleasure riding though.Bit off topic, but why should cycling in the morning be more commitment than at any other time? unless of course you suffer from heavy quilt syndrome.
Not talking about commuting here. I could think of a few reasons off the top of my head regarding pleasure riding though.
actualy if its for your turbo trainer , forget the heart rate monitor, get an mp3 player - ZZtop and - BURN.
I set a fan up to stop me melting - it does help and if your tough put it in front so your cycling into a headwind all the time.
I hate exercise in the morning , 6.15 - 3mile run I hated it, and I was useless (well my mates said I was useless all the time)
But it is definately harder. - in my younger days I liked early morning cycle rides.
as for loosing weight, if you burn 400calories on your bike, you can eat 400calories for fre
but its true - exercise all you like , you have to eat sensibly all the time to loose weight.
No matter what 'zone' you 'train' in for what duration, if, over time, your calorific intake is greater than your calorific burn rate you won't lose weight.
I am the same. Tells me roughly how hard I am pushing myself. I wouldn't try to read too much else into it. Apart from if it stopped I am either dead or it needs a new battery.I don't use an HRM for weight loss - I use it to tell me how fast my heart is beating and for gauging what % of my max I am riding at. It's not much use for anything else...and the calorie estimates on HRMs are completely useless anyway...
your turbo trainer ussually has a cycling computer on it giving you calorie data ectra.
the heart rate monitor is a good safety device to stop you over exercising.
I admit I set the fan up behind me as I must go faster with a tailwind
your turbo trainer ussually has a cycling computer on it giving you calorie data ectra.
the heart rate monitor is a good safety device to stop you over exercising.
Ok, how do you calculate the burn more accurately?Eh? Calorie estimates based on HR data are little better than a wild guess.