It isn't "what they have", it is about the fact that the very low production numbers means amortisation of the development costs is a very large part of the overall cost of the bike.
To keep competitve cycling an athletic endeavor and not start a technological spending race . This comes up at least once a year on one forum or another.
That's not a lot when it comes to sporting equipment at the highest level. As mentioned earlier you can multiply that by ten when it comes Olympic level track cycling.
Also they don't violate the rules but pass with the very smallest margins , which is exactly what they are for .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.