Crankarm,
This is a pointless debate
You now think it is pointless as you know you've lost
.
If my house is broken into, when I am away. I am a victim. There has been no assault on me. In the same way, the lady was a victim of violent behaviour- for the offences see my earlier post.
Re assaulting a car - please show me and the rest of the forum where I have said or suggested there is such an offence. I have never said or implied such a thing.
You seem to be twisting words and importing things into what I have said
Isn't this what lawyers do. You should be used to it, taste of your own medicine.
Re criminal damage - you would note that I said criminal damage or attempted criminal damage was a POSSIBLE offence - neither I nor you have examined said car so do not know if there was damage. We only have an account from one party to the incident.
As for the last question, that is not what is alleged to have happened and I am not going to be side tracked by such diversionary tactics.
And of course being a defence lawyer you have NEVER used diversionary tactics ..........
You clearly seem to think you know the law so well that it would not be hard for you to look up said situation