Bargain.

OP
markharry66

markharry66

Über Member
zoom_d0acbf3831584864b5a38264a55e525f.jpg
 

vickster

Legendary Member
Yea, but the one you are looking at already has rack and mudguards. You'd want those on the decathlon too, which would cost £50 and add the 2 kg

I'd go with ridgeback myself
 

Thursday guy

Active Member
Yea, but the one you are looking at already has rack and mudguards. You'd want those on the decathlon too, which would cost £50 and add the 2 kg

I'd go with ridgeback myself
I didn't realise the mudguards and rack would add an extra 2 kg, I thought they would weigh less than that. But I've double checked the weight for the ridgeback again and it turns out I got it wrong, it weighs 13.6kg, not 12.9kg as I've stated before (I assume though that this took into account the rack and the mudguards). Do you still think its worth getting the ridgeback over the b'twin fit 300?
 
Top Bottom