Make 2 identical frames. One with cheap and nasty steel, one with Reynolds 999 super Mango gold myrhh steel. Each frame will...
Weigh the same.
Feel the same to ride.
The difference is the super duper steel is stronger, so in reality less of it needs to be used and the frame can thus be made lighter. This idea that one steel feels nice to ride the another is tosh - that characteristic is all down to the design of the tubes, and the design and construction of the frame.
So it terms of 'better', the finest steel could theoretically make the lightest frame, and that's it. Nothing more. In all other regards, such as 'feel, comfort, springiness, the ability to absorb road buzz, etc, cheap stteel from a 1970s Lancia is every bit as good as a Columbus frame brazed using the Popes tears.
So the only advantage Columbus may or may not have over anything else is weight. How it is ulitised by the tube manufacturer and the frame builder are the two things that define the frame characteristics. Therefore, alas, the question is a pointless one - you may as well ask if the sun is better than the moon, or if Trump is better than Reagan. You've not been duped, but unless your overriding priority when buying a frame is weight, then you may have been chasing a chimaera.