Hont
Guru
- Location
- Bromsgrove
I'm looking at buying a new bike. On my current model I feel a bit too stretched out (i.e. arms stretched forward, sitting on the end of the saddle etc), so I've been thinking about getting a slightly smaller frame for the new one. Here, however I am confused.
Looking at the dimension differences for frame sizes, most offer only a 10ml reduction in length of top tube for each size difference, so a bike recommended for someone 5'1", for example, has a top tube only 60ml shorter than one for someone who is 6'1". That seems not enough to me, even if you take smaller stems into consideration. What am I missing? How is someone a foot shorter able to comfortably reach the bars when reach is only reduced by 80ml or so?
Do shorter people have proportionally longer bodies and arms? Or is there some other aspect of the geometry that affects reach?
EDIT. It probably is the stems isn't it. I was forgetting that you can get 60ml stems these days.
Looking at the dimension differences for frame sizes, most offer only a 10ml reduction in length of top tube for each size difference, so a bike recommended for someone 5'1", for example, has a top tube only 60ml shorter than one for someone who is 6'1". That seems not enough to me, even if you take smaller stems into consideration. What am I missing? How is someone a foot shorter able to comfortably reach the bars when reach is only reduced by 80ml or so?
Do shorter people have proportionally longer bodies and arms? Or is there some other aspect of the geometry that affects reach?
EDIT. It probably is the stems isn't it. I was forgetting that you can get 60ml stems these days.