Bike Theft Decriminalised

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

classic33

Leg End Member
FWIW I cant leave my ebike at Leeds Station anyway as all ebikes are banned from the stands, so if it did get stolen I'd probably get told off.
You've seen the posters?
 
Drop your bike down your local station and leave it there for the day and see how you get on.

a while ago I used to do this every day

and there are bikes - the same ones - at the nearest station every day

They don;t get stolen every day

some might every now and again - but not every day

The main reason I don;t cycle to the station when I need to get the train is simply that all the bike locking places are occupied by bikes
 

katiewlx

Active Member
#
The cycle racks at Chelmsford station are divided into three groups: there are ones that are open to all comers, then a group which are completely enclosed in a steel cage, and another lot indoors under one of the arches. I don't know what the charges or access arrangements are, or whether the BTP policy would apply to all equally.

It's in development, according to Co-pilot.

Same here. Generally the only times I left the bike unattended were for a few minutes whilst I bought groceries when on tour.


the "secure" steel cage is about £25 a year, the reason I say "secure" is because whilst your £25 gets you an access token, all a thief needs to do, which Im pretty sure I witnessed once, is they hang around the area in a hi viz cycle jacket, when the train from London or wherever gets in during the rush hour and theres suddenly crowds everywhere and actually no-one is paying attention to anyone, a couple of cyclists go to get their bikes, they just follow them in before the door closes, then waste some time getting ready to cycle, the other cyclists go as theyll want to get home and then theyre free to cut the lock and leave.

I actually think the policy the BTP took once those secure bike parks came years back now, they wouldnt investigate bike thefts from any other part of the station or surrounding the station unless your bike was in the secure bike bit.


the problem is even if they did review CCTV, whats that going to prove other than when your bike was stolen ? which you already know, its not going to be some 4k ultra hi def picture that enables face recognition, its going to be blurry, grainy footage, the thief probably knows to cover their face, or never look directly at the camera. So what leads have you got to go on ? The only time it ever leads to a prosecution is if they catch the thief in the act, and they fess up to all the other bikes they stole.
 

wiggydiggy

Legendary Member
Makes me think that maybe e-bikes should be provided with self destruct mechanisms. If they get nicked they set fire to themselves.

Some kind of spike that comes up out the saddle would be good as well.

You've seen the posters?

Yeah I never got around to posting pics but they're at every bike rack, I wonder if its just a Leeds instruction as I haven't seen them elsewhere.
 

Psamathe

Über Member
Trawling CCTV footage for the thief is something AI would be perfect for. It would take minutes at most.
It's smoke and mirrors by the Police (again). No way would they need to watch eg 12 hrs CCTV

eg somebody leaves their bike at 07:00 and returning 19:00 it's been stolen. Police don't start watching from 07:00 and finish at 16:30 when it was stolen to see the theft. They look at a frame at 13:00 and it's still there. Look at another frame at 16:00 and still there. So frame at 17:30 it's gone so back to frame at 16:45 it's gone so maybe watch frrom 16:00 so only a 45 min window,Could even do more single frame points to further reduce the 45 min window but my boring explanation goes on too long and tl;dr.

CCTV is recorded to hard disk drive these days so takes just seconds to look at each of the times to reduce the "theft window".

So this studying hours of video is complete twaddle. We finished with VHS tape with slow fast forward years ago, it's instanteaneous jumps to time points.. There is something else going on.
 
Last edited:

figbat

Former slippery scientist
It's smoke and mirrors by the Police (again). No way would they need to watch eg 12 hrs CCTV

eg somebody leaves their bike at 07:00 and returning 19:00 it's been stolen. Police don't start watching from 07:00 and finish at 16:30 when it was stolen to see the theft. They look at a frame at 13:00 and it's still there. Look at another frame at 16:00 and still there. So frame at 17:30 it's gone so back to frame at 16:45 it's gone so maybe watch frrom 16:00 so only a 45 min window,Could even do more single frame points to further reduce the 45 min window but my boring explanation goes on too long and tl;dr.

CCTV is recorded to hard disk drive these days so takes just seconds to look at each of the times to reduce the "theft window".

So this studying hours of video is complete twaddle. We finished with VHS tape with slow fast forward years ago, it's instanteaneous jumps to time points.. There is something else going on.

They could also watch the narrowed-down time period at 2- or 3-times speed just to see when it vanishes, then backup and watch the critical time more closely.
 

Dadam

Über Member
Location
SW Leeds
It's smoke and mirrors by the Police (again). No way would they need to watch eg 12 hrs CCTV

eg somebody leaves their bike at 07:00 and returning 19:00 it's been stolen. Police don't start watching from 07:00 and finish at 16:30 when it was stolen to see the theft. They look at a frame at 13:00 and it's still there. Look at another frame at 16:00 and still there. So frame at 17:30 it's gone so back to frame at 16:45 it's gone so maybe watch frrom 16:00 so only a 45 min window,Could even do more single frame points to further reduce the 45 min window but my boring explanation goes on too long and tl;dr.

CCTV is recorded to hard disk drive these days so takes just seconds to look at each of the times to reduce the "theft window".

So this studying hours of video is complete twaddle. We finished with VHS tape with slow fast forward years ago, it's instanteaneous jumps to time points.. There is something else going on.

Binary search. Halving the window each time you look at a frame gets it down to a 1.5 minute window in 9 frames.
It would take them 5 minutes tops.
 
OP
OP
presta

presta

Legendary Member
the "secure" steel cage is about £25 a year, the reason I say "secure" is because whilst your £25 gets you an access token, all a thief needs to do, which Im pretty sure I witnessed once, is they hang around the area in a hi viz cycle jacket, when the train from London or wherever gets in during the rush hour and theres suddenly crowds everywhere and actually no-one is paying attention to anyone, a couple of cyclists go to get their bikes, they just follow them in before the door closes, then waste some time getting ready to cycle, the other cyclists go as theyll want to get home and then theyre free to cut the lock and leave.
Or steal as many as you like for £25.
Some kind of spike that comes up out the saddle would be good as well.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdNwvy-VLnI&t=56s

It's smoke and mirrors by the Police (again). No way would they need to watch eg 12 hrs CCTV

eg somebody leaves their bike at 07:00 and returning 19:00 it's been stolen. Police don't start watching from 07:00 and finish at 16:30 when it was stolen to see the theft. They look at a frame at 13:00 and it's still there. Look at another frame at 16:00 and still there. So frame at 17:30 it's gone so back to frame at 16:45 it's gone so maybe watch frrom 16:00 so only a 45 min window,Could even do more single frame points to further reduce the 45 min window but my boring explanation goes on too long and tl;dr.

CCTV is recorded to hard disk drive these days so takes just seconds to look at each of the times to reduce the "theft window".

So this studying hours of video is complete twaddle. We finished with VHS tape with slow fast forward years ago, it's instanteaneous jumps to time points.. There is something else going on.
Only if you have a video with the parked bike in view.
 

blackrat

Senior Member
As has been said many times, the police lack the resources/man power these days to follow up low level crimes.
There are easier pickings in Britain these days where the police do not have to confront nasty people.
 

mustang1

Legendary Member
Location
London, UK
They need to AI that sh1t. Let AI trawl through footage. BTW I'm not blaming BTP, it's the system of low resources. Ha omg said they, they won't have the money to implement an AI system so back to Square One.
 

Gwylan

Guru
Location
All at sea⛵
They need to AI that sh1t. Let AI trawl through footage. BTW I'm not blaming BTP, it's the system of low resources. Ha omg said they, they won't have the money to implement an AI system so back to Square One.

Frankly, prevention might be better than resolution.

But it's sad when the best course of action is to have your bike in your hotel room.
 

Psamathe

Über Member
They need to AI that sh1t.
As pointed out above, no need to "trawl through" anything. Search eg 12hrs of CCTV in a few minuter with real person using thrir eyes.

This has nothing to do with time searching CCTV and Police are not giving their realreadons.
 
Top Bottom