Cycling on the pavement is dangerous
There are lots of pavements where cycling isn't dangerous if common sense is used.
Cycling on the pavement is dangerous
That's as maybe, but its illegal in Blackpool and he wasn't on the prom so that's irrelevant.Cycling on the pavement is perfectly legal in many countries.
This guy was reckless.
You can legally cycle on a pavement in Britain if your life is regarded as being in danger, also that mother was being totally irresponsible letting a small child run free, towards a main roadThat's as maybe, but its illegal in Blackpool and he wasn't on the prom so that's irrelevant.
The child was following the mother, and the dad ( possibly) was right behind. That's not irresponsible.You can legally cycle on a pavement in Britain if your life is regarded as being in danger, also that mother was being totally irresponsible letting a small child run free, towards a main road
unless his life was in danger, a responsible parent of a child that age should have been more attentiveThe child was following the mother, and the dad ( possibly) was right behind. That's not irresponsible.
The guy should've been riding on the road. End of.
If the child had run onto the road, you would have a point. But the child was on the pavement, so you don't have a point. If a 3'1 adult had walked out of their gate the cyclist would have hit them just the same, so don't make this out to be anything the child (or their parents) did wrongunless his life was in danger, a responsible parent of a child that age should have been more attentive
No you can't. The guidance from the Home Office isYou can legally cycle on a pavement in Britain if your life is regarded as being in danger
but that still doesn't make it actually legal. Also, a responsible cyclist does not ride his bike into pedestrians, so I doubt this guidance would apply anyway ..."The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required."
correct, a responsible cyclist does not ride his/her bike into a pedestrian, just as this cyclist did not ride his bike into a pedestrian, in this case the pedestrian ran in front of the cyclistNo you can't. The guidance from the Home Office is
but that still doesn't make it actually legal. Also, a responsible cyclist does not ride his bike into pedestrians, so I doubt this guidance would apply anyway ...
correct, a responsible cyclist does not ride his/her bike into a pedestrian, just as this cyclist did not ride his bike into a pedestrian, in this case the pedestrian ran in front of the cyclist
correct, a responsible cyclist does not ride his/her bike into a pedestrian, just as this cyclist did not ride his bike into a pedestrian, in this case the pedestrian ran in front of the cyclist
Tell me if my expectations are too high here, but I'd have thought that dragging a toddler 12 feet along the pavement does not fall within the parameters of "showing consideration" towards themPaul Boateng said:... and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so