MUST NOT is in the HC in the use of box junctions (guide here). They are not there as a deterrent, and the HC makes it quite clear on the use of them. They aren't a new thing, I remember this from when I started driving, err, quite along time ago.
LA appease drivers anyway by putting up signs warning of the impending appearance of speed cameras and in some places the use of cameras at junctions where there is persistent red light jumping. Are even more 'Watch out for something that may catch you rule breaking' notices really needed?
In what way are the yellow box markings not sufficient warning?
"If you don't play by the rules you risk getting your wrist slapped." Will that do?Can you tell me how I as a driver I would be given sufficient warning that I would incur a £130 fine if I wrongly stopped in a box junction?
It's not a local law. It's a MUST NOT so a legal requirement in the HC so I'm quite aware there may be a penalty if I was to contravene it, thanks. Relevant law as per 'The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002' as in the link I provided.You have replied to my thread. You therefore incur a charge of £130.00 for doing this (reduced to £65.00 if you pay within a week).
^^ Is this fair an OK with you?
I think it is not as you were not aware of the charge being applicable. If by doing something a charge is payable then the person needs to be made aware of this. This is universal and on the road any fines or charges are in areas where notice of the charge is given.
I do not dispute that stopping in a box junction is wrong but that is not the issue. It is about a local law in which a fine is levied where the person incurring fine is not given notice of it.
The same cameras could be used to impose fines for not looking in the mirror, not indicting, driving too close, or any other aspect of the highway code. Are you all happy to run the gauntlet of such fines? Or should the fine only apply to some elements of the highway code?
'Decent behaviour' - there's your reason. Seems to disappear in a lot of people once they get in a car and no longer have to make eye contact with the rest of the world.No, not really. The bit I am not getting is why anyone needs paint on the floor to tell them not to block the road up for other people. It is just a simple matter of decent behaviour. In the absence of a better explanation, demanding small print on top is indicative of a personality disorder
"If you don't play by the rules you risk getting your wrist slapped." Will that do?
It's not a local law. It's a MUST NOT so a legal requirement in the HC so I'm quite aware there may be a penalty if I was to contravene it, thanks. Relevant law as per 'The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002' as in the link I provided.
Enforcement of the law with cameras may be more of a local issue for which you believe there should be warning notices, but even then there is no requirement for the Police or local authority to put up warning notices at any box junction/bus lane before standing there and handing out fixed penalties. Your comparison with posts to this thread is irrelevant.
I am curious to know how the automatic cameras are activated... there may be situations where traffic is moving across the junction but if the camera was to take a photo, you couldn't tell the vehicles were moving?
![]()
This was a photo on the website found searching for 'automatic cameras on box junctions'... in this example if your exit is clear you can enter the box juntion, so only the grey Corsa should have been fined... be interesting to know what the outcome was in this case. To be fair it isn't clear whether the traffic had started to move forward beyond the black car with it's brake lights showing, enabling the Corsa to move out, because it isn't video footage... see what I mean?
I am quite happy for a policeman to enforce the highway code. I have agreed to abide by the highway code and the penalties within t.