It isn't about taking umbrage.
This thread, like many others, is trying to impart safety advice to other cyclists. And this thread will be read by others long after we have finished posting to it. If I asserted, on the basis of anecdata and pleas to "common sense", that my St Christopher Medal makes me 1% safer I'd expect to be challenged.
People make assertions in here, over and over, like "flashing lights attract the eye, Thats (sic) why they have them on Emergency vehicles" and I'm interested in understanding the science behind those assertions, given that, for instance, flashing blue lights were introduced with, so far as I can tell, no scientific basis for their design and no consistency globally over colour choice, intensity and flash frequency. Some evidence exists that flashing lights may be effective in attracting attention particularly when they are located in the periphery of vision but the results are not entirely consistent nor conclusive and very little research has been done about the use of such lights on motor vehicles and even less on bicycles.
Yet people make assertions about flashing lights improving rider safety and thousands of cyclists have started using them. Along with St Christopher's?
Glad to read you are not taking umbridge and I do accept your point to a degree. But what kind of evidence would you require? Even quotes from peer review documents are meaningless unless you go and read the source . at some point you have to use your judgement having sifted through the best data you can get your hands on. I think this differentiates from some religious good luck charm. There must be more controversial statements we can debate than whether flashing lights attract the eye. I'm sure one will come along shortly.