After reading this thread, and being awed by the sort of numbers that some contributors are chucking about, I see how others are struggling to do much shorter distances and I feel so fortunate to have the health to do what I do. I can't help wondering if the reason that I can keep cycling is because I have been cycling, even to a much lesser degree, for years. I'm the sort of person that keeps records and would have loved the concept of Eddington days if I'd discovered it decades ago.
The thing about Eddington numbers is that everyone's got one, no matter how modest your aspirations and if you've had health issues or are recovering from some significant injury it can be a motivator. Like riding your age in miles, the higher the number, the harder it gets.
There is a thread called Tiny Rides (of 2023) whose title could do with uppdating but I've contributed to that from time to time because I believe that a bicycle is a great liberator. You don't have to do gargantuan mileages to benefit from the joys of cycling. Maybe you used to at one time, but for various reasons can't at present. A bicycle as a mobility aid, be it seven league boots for prospective mile munchers, or something that makes it possible to get out and about and get to the shops, is a marvellous thing. Even a short ride has merit. In the echo chamber of a cycling forum, we might be focused on performance, but even the the mileages of the most modest contributor on here are likely to make the head of a non cyclist member of the public explode with amazement. You rode how far? If they have to ask why, it's probable that they will never understand.
At the moment I can ride my age in miles, but like everyone else, I wonder how long I will be able to keep it up.