Fab Foodie said:Surprisingly biblical!
andyoxon said:I like Luke. It also can't be shortened, OK... well "Lu" is pretty unlikely.
Have a look at this:
http://www.babycentre.co.uk/pregnancy/naming/topnames2004/#2
Top 10...
# Jack
# Joshua
# Thomas
# James
# Daniel
# Samuel
# Oliver
# William
# Benjamin
# Joseph
Luke is at no.15
Andy
Andy in Sig said:Somebody's already noted how biblical that list is. Also a bit Norman-French. Definitely not good.
Alan Frame said:I always think that you have to look at the first name in conjunction with the last one, the old Ben Dover, Hugh Jarse, Mike Hunt syndrome.
Are they Spanish by any chance? That's how it would be pronounced en Espanol...Arch said:OT a bit, a friend of mine was telling the story the other day of a child who was being taught by a friend of his. Asked his name, the boy said "Goo-ey". Thinking this was unusual, the teacher checked again, to be told "Goo-ey" again. "How do you spell that?"
"G-U-Y..."
NO one had thought to point out to the child, or parents that they were pronouncing his name wrong, for five years.... And the parents had CHOSEN to call him Goo-ey!