Conductor really needed?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
..and if they are naughty?
UltraQuip-UQ20021-rw-10073-8755.jpg
 
....or for a magical performance?

Harry_Potter_Wand_Bronze.jpg
 

Sara_H

Guru
Unless it's French, in which case it's a baguette, which leads us strangely back to bread...
Hmm. A famous quote from my MIL's french friend, when presented with a sainsburys 'baguette" whilst visiting Blighty, "Eeet iz nice, but eeet iz not baguette."
 

swee'pea99

Squire
"I think conductors are completely over-rated anyway, because if you love music, why not play it? Why wave around and get off on some ego shoot? I don't think the audience give a shoot about the conductor. Not unless they've been pumped full of propaganda from classical music writing or something. I mean," he rants on cheerfully, "no one normal understands what the conductor does. No one knows what they do! They just wave their arms out of time."

...says that nice Mr Kennedy
http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/aug/30/nigel-kennedy-interview-conductors-overrated
 

thom

____
Location
The Borough
So, watching last night of the proms. Is the conductor really needed. All the instrument players seem to know when to start and stop on there own. Indeed they very rarely even look up from their music sheets.
Might I asked, what in particular prompted you to ask this question having watched the first occasion in 118 years on which a woman conducted the event ?
 

jazzkat

Fixed wheel fanatic.
At the highest levels a conductors job is not just to get everyone to play together or to balance volumes, the better players will do that anyway.
In a professional orchestra (band/choir etc) the job of the conductor is to shape the performance. Yes by instigating subtle and almost imperceptible changes in tempo, volume, increased accents of certain notes etc the performance can sound so much better (or worse! lol).
It's also true that pro players 'up their game' when a charismatic and experienced conductor lifts the baton, a bit like when everyone is on their best behaviour at work when 'the suits' come down to see you.
All the players will be able to see the conductor over the top of their stands. You also know where the important bits of music are and you tend to look more at the conductor at those points.

Being a conductor is an amazing musical experience. Instead of just being one cog in the machine, you are driving! It's not just ego, but being in control of the whole performance is daunting and thrilling in equal measure and allows you, as a musician, to stamp your interpretation on the performance in the way that solo performers can.
 
U

User169

Guest
Essential in big works, but smaller stuff can be more exiciting without - I think this is really what Kennedy was getting at. I've played under enough dodgy conductors, in fairness largely students and semi-pro aspirants, to know that they're sometimes best ignored at which point you hope that the leader knows what they're doing.

My favourite orchestral moment was a dispute between an oboist and conductor. The rehearsal ground to a bit of a halt when the oboist called the conductor a "nincompoop" - the only time I've ever heard anyone use that word. I've just googled them both and the oboe dude is now a philospophy prof in London and the conductor did actually make it as a pro.
 
Top Bottom