Cycle paths adjacent to main roads

[blackrat]

Do you use English or French?

I have no idea what that means, is it intended it be snarky?

 

[Andy in Germany]

There is a lot of difference in walking along a pavement full of other walkers versus hardly anyone else walking at all. With a crowd one naturally gives way, which is not required if the pavement is infrequently used. It is the same with cycling. It is probably different for commuters where the importance of crossing the Rubicon every day takes on a new meaning. Cycling for pleasure means just that, for pleasure, not for confrontation. If a car or truck thinks it wants my space, I will readily concede, as long as it is safe for me to do so.

Well, it does if you aren't trying to get anywhere, and if like you or I, you are able-bodied, and experienced enough to deal with vehicles. However, for families trying to do the shopping, and kids trying to get to school, for example, you need to get to your destination in a reasonable time, and sharing roads with trucks and private cars is both dangerous and terrifying.
This is why the number of children and families on bikes increases dramatically where there's safe, well-built infrastructure. You may not feel the need, but they do.
Come to that, so do I: I was able to accept at least one job because I knew there was a traffic free cycleway following the main road from home to work: the alternative would have been riding on a busy road, equivalent to an A-road in the UK, which wouldn't have been practical.
In cases like this a cycleway isn't just safer, it's a good investment: it's a lot cheaper to maintain a cycleway than a road, so I was bringing in money to the economy while costing less than the cars passing me every day.

 

[Mike_P]

Pretty certain no motorist no matter how short of braincells they are has ever suggested to a cyclist they use this cycle path, yes the far end is where the pole with its sign hidden in the trees is. Exit from a retail park and a few industrial units onto the A59 Skipton Road in Harrogate

Its one that could be readilly removed and the signs reused somewhere more useful.
An even dafter one on the Otley Road has been removed, it diverged to form a separate route through a pedestrian crossing and then immediately rejoined the carriageway with give way markings, all on a steepish gradient where no cyclist wants to stop.

 

[blackrat]

Well, it does if you aren't trying to get anywhere, and if like you or I, you are able-bodied, and experienced enough to deal with vehicles. However, for families trying to do the shopping, and kids trying to get to school, for example, you need to get to your destination in a reasonable time, and sharing roads with trucks and private cars is both dangerous and terrifying.
This is why the number of children and families on bikes increases dramatically where there's safe, well-built infrastructure. You may not feel the need, but they do.
Come to that, so do I: I was able to accept at least one job because I knew there was a traffic free cycleway following the main road from home to work: the alternative would have been riding on a busy road, equivalent to an A-road in the UK, which wouldn't have been practical.
In cases like this a cycleway isn't just safer, it's a good investment: it's a lot cheaper to maintain a cycleway than a road, so I was bringing in money to the economy while costing less than the cars passing me every day.

"You may not feel the need, but they do."
I do feel the need, but as I said, it does not exist in Britain, certainly nowhere near the extent that it does in France and maybe some northern European countries.

 

[Oldhippy]

As I've previously mentioned, if cycling advocacy groups banded together along with cyclists to shout as loud as the motoring lobbiesnaybe there would be some gains made. It took one woman in Holland to start a cycling revolution when her child getting run over was one death too many and look where they are now. It isn't a fast process nor is it impossible as many countries across the world prove. Lobby mp's repeatedly and don't stop until they listen. Currently in the UK it seems idealistic I agree but I don't think it is impossible and won't be tomorrow.

 

[katiewlx]

What radar scans ahead for passing places?

mk1 eyeball

Ive always maintained absolutely you dont want the crazy loose nut behind the wheel behind you, but I wont just dive into a hedge to let them by, Ill pick a safe for me place to pass, and if I have to ride in a manner that blocks the overtake till that point, I will.

 

[Alex321]

I have no idea what that means, is it intended it be snarky?

It was I think, a slightly humorous reference to the fact you said you were having a discussion with your routing app, together with the fact you were talking about routing in France.

 

[matticus]

It was I think, a slightly humorous reference to the fact you said you were having a discussion with your routing app, together with the fact you were talking about routing in France.

Only slightly?!? Sacre bleu!!!

 

[ebikeerwidnes]

There is a lot of difference in walking along a pavement full of other walkers versus hardly anyone else walking at all. With a crowd one naturally gives way, which is not required if the pavement is infrequently used. It is the same with cycling. It is probably different for commuters where the importance of crossing the Rubicon every day takes on a new meaning. Cycling for pleasure means just that, for pleasure, not for confrontation. If a car or truck thinks it wants my space, I will readily concede, as long as it is safe for me to do so.

Good illustration

Most people on a crowded path will adopt an attitude of co-operating and giving way

but even then you do get some people who HAVE to get there faster and will insist on pushing past and ignoring people coming towards them

In an airport you can understand that they might be late for a plane or something

but I am sure we have all seen it in shops and the like where they are just being ignorant, self centred and downright rude

I used to see this a lot with older people in supermarkets - a certain type of older person just walks in a straight like with their trolley and EXPECTS that people will get out of the way

I noticed it a lot once when my knee gave out and I have problem turning corners as it twisted my knee
so to turn with a trolley (containing my stick!) I had to stop and turn it a fraction , shuffle round to match it, then repeat

it meant that a lot of people who I had previously just gone round I now could not do so quickly and had to do it slowly
it showed me just how many people in Tesco I had been giving way to before that
and how many of them were really just rude

 

[matticus]

As I've previously mentioned, if cycling advocacy groups banded together along with cyclists to shout as loud as the motoring lobbiesnaybe there would be some gains made. It took one woman in Holland to start a cycling revolution when her child getting run over was one death too many and look where they are now. It isn't a fast process nor is it impossible as many countries across the world prove. Lobby mp's repeatedly and don't stop until they listen. Currently in the UK it seems idealistic I agree but I don't think it is impossible and won't be tomorrow.

I would add that if you live in the right area of the UK, the process is already happening! (every week I either see pics posted here, of stuff from local news where noisy motorists are complaining about new bike lanes)

Yes, it's frustrating if you live in a car-focused regime; but it's encouraging to see many progressive places in the UK. It shows that the "UK mindset" is NOT universally car-centric