Dayvo
just passin' through
- Location
- 59° 50′ 5.55″ N, 10° 47′ 41.89″ E
. Wear what you like, Steph![]()
Yeah, too right. And tell your son to

. Wear what you like, Steph![]()
It doesn't work properly though.
I don't have a problem with that. We can make whatever assumptions of the situation as appropriate to our understanding of it, rightly or wrongly. And that is fine as we can't all agree, or understand, the exact requirements of any OP's post and make the correct response.
It works mighty well for the sponsors when fans buy the shirts with the ads on them !
The analogy you're trying to make is spurious; @ianrauk isn't trying to suggest people who buy shirts get sponsored.
I answered her question. It's about sponsorship.
Who cares if you cover or alter brands, that's not what S7ephanie was asking.
I read his and your posts differently - you must allow that I have my opinion too - I thought you dismissed his point in an unhelpful manner to be honest (although you might not have intended that). I think he's dismissed your dismissal of his dismissal of your dismissal and is not really worried about this anymore anyway !I don't have a problem with that. We can make whatever assumptions of the situation as appropriate to our understanding of it, rightly or wrongly. And that is fine as we can't all agree, or understand, the exact requirements of any OP's post and make the correct response.
However, his issue with my post would appear to be that I added my own thoughts regarding my views on branding. Something which he seems to feel isn't allowed, nor appropriate, on an open and friendly forum. I don't believe I received the memo from @Shaun in that respect. However, if such a memo has been issued then I would humbly apologise to @s7ephanie and retract my comment, and all others of a similar nature on this forum.
Godwin's law in action - very romantic !Wow, did admin go on holiday and appoint you Fuhrer?
Yes, that is fair enough and quite fair and reasonable.I read his and your posts differently - you must allow that I have my opinion too - I thought you dismissed his point in an unhelpful manner to be honest (although you might not have intended that). I think he's dismissed your dismissal of his dismissal of your dismissal and is not really worried about this anymore anyway !
It's not worth getting all shirty about, eh?children, children please - no throwing dummies out of prams please xxxx
Yes, that is fair enough and quite fair and reasonable.
My quote wasn't a dismissal of his view at all, just as in many instances one person quotes another in reference and that was all it was.
He said the word and I added my view of that word in my response to the OP.
His objection appears to be about my adding that I cover up brands, in addition to a response to the OP, not my interpretation of sponsorship.
However, I am happy to let this rest if no offense was meant on either side.
They are probably fasterDon't get me started on F1 nerds that own a 1.4 diesel and think they have something in common with Jenson Button, because they wear the same merchandise
Our club has sponsors and Im afraid they re on the tops.Join a club in your area.. wear the club top/shorts no adverts on the top just the club name you represent !Then you can feel like your own pro !