Will1985 said:Thanks guys - there wasn't an intention to define some posters
Don't worry.

I find it strange how some people seem to like being labelled

Will1985 said:Thanks guys - there wasn't an intention to define some posters
Jakes Dad said:Maybe i should campaign for a Leisure Cyclist Section![]()
Rhythm Thief said:"Leisure cyclist" is anyone who uses a bike purely for pleasure, be they Audaxers, testers, road racers, singletrackers or track racers. Anyone who uses a bike for transport is a true cyclist.
<runs and hides>
Don't make that distinction. You'll be accused of being cyclistist.alecstilleyedye said:how about cyclists and Cyclists?
Maz said:Don't make that distinction. You'll be accused of being cyclistist.
simonali said:I like the prats on bikes one myself! The no lights, dark clothing brigade is growing I reckon, as I see 5 or 6 in the (dark) mornings in just a few miles on my way to or from work. This includes lads on BMXs delivering papers. If I had a son and he was off out at 6am in the winter to do a paper round I'd be checking his lights/brakes etc were working every night! Imagine losing a child because you didn't buy them some cheap LED flashers before sending them out to earn their pocket money?
The parents of these youngsters are as bad as the 'prats on bikes' themselves.