Deaths when not using helmet

[twobiker]

I am sure that this is done around election time. I doubt very much it is the normal state of affairs.

My concern is that it may produce the knee-jerk reaction that governments do best. and it winds up some people.

 

[twobiker]

I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to resort to snide personal comments.

I am not sure why you are asking that question, or are you the only one allowed to respond to comment?. you chose to swear. and now you play miss innocent.

 

[twobiker]

He was simply thinking of this lady http://en.wikipedia....ndy_O._Williams

One day the duck may turn into a swan, then maybe not.

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to resort to snide personal comments.

No other way of "winning" the argument?

Evidence? Nope!
Logic? Nope!
Belief being challenged? Yep!

Lash out!

Be glad we are in this century , look what happened to Galileo!

 

[twobiker]

No other way of "winning" the argument?

Evidence? Nope!
Logic? Nope!
Belief being challenged? Yep!

Lash out!

Be glad we are in this century , look what happened to Galileo!

What argument, I responded to being sworn at , I don't accept it at work and I won't accept it here, and my belief has not been challenged , you just ignored my question. which in turn then answers my question. Going got to tough for you did it?, perhaps you would like to insert a text profanity in your reply. the last recourse of the dry well.

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

What argument, I responded to being sworn at , I don't accept it at work and I won't accept it here, and my belief has not been challenged , you just ignored my question. which in turn then answers my question. Going got to tough for you did it?, perhaps you would like to insert a text profanity in your reply. the last recourse of the dry well.

I apologise, you don't need a belief to be challenged to lash out!



Evidence ? Nope!
Logic? Nope!
Belief challenged ? Nope, but not needed

Lash out!


Is that better?

 

[benb]

What argument, I responded to being sworn at , I don't accept it at work and I won't accept it here, and my belief has not been challenged , you just ignored my question. which in turn then answers my question. Going got to tough for you did it?, perhaps you would like to insert a text profanity in your reply. the last recourse of the dry well.

I didn't swear at you, and I don't understand why you're so touchy about my use of FFS, FFS. I think you're trying to divert.

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

I didn't swear at you, and I don't understand why you're so touchy about my use of FFS, FFS. I think you're trying to divert.

+1

 

[twobiker]

+1

Divert from what ? , you have had nothing original to say about helmets on this post or any other post, just waffle , and the usual pick a this, pick at that which you think constitutes discussion. cracked records the pair of you.

 

[twobiker]

I didn't swear at you, and I don't understand why you're so touchy about my use of FFS, FFS. I think you're trying to divert.

You are like a child that shouts BUM and then runs off, grow up.

 

[Angelfishsolo]

Your arse smells (shouted from 50m away). Yep that is a good analogy.

 

[benb]

You are like a child that shouts BUM and then runs off, grow up.

You threw a hissy fit at my use of a rather tame swear, and you're telling me to grow up?

Bizarre.

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

Divert from what ?

Answering questions.

 

[Little yellow Brompton]

You are like a child that shouts BUM and then runs off, grow up.

How dare you swear at me!

 

[ufkacbln]

To answer that first I will ask you a question. I take it your purpose for entering these debates, is to illustrate to the "ill informed" the shortcommings of wearing a helmet correct ? If this is the purpose, do you think you have made a good job of it ?
How many people who have entered into the debate have you convinced of this?

Sorry 3 questions.

When people have entered the debate with a different point of view they are immediately set upon talked down to and insulted. Some of these people may have far more experience in the world of cycling than you, but still you are not prepared to listen to what they have to say.

Do you really think this is the way to get your point across?

Why do you think so few members enter into helmet debates?

Hopefully you may take some of this on board and the quality of debate will improve.

But and its a very big but as long as you continue not to listen others will switch off and you 3 will be left jibbering away to yourselves.

Quite often the purpose is to challenge unrealistic, inflated and simply erroneous clams

Do you believe that a full face helmet is unnecessary because normal helmets are wide enough to prevent facial injuries?

Is it incorrect to refute such bizarre and unfounded claims?