The issue I have with electronic gears - and as I mentioned earlier, in fairness my only experience is with an early version with 2015 Ultegra Di2 - is the lack of serviceability. My bike, a secondhand Scott Addict 15, arrived without the gears working properly. To fix it, I had to Google "Di2 not working", download the Shimano app, download an older version of the Shimano app because the new version didn't recognise my bike, navigate through no end of troubleshooting menus to be told that the app couldn't find the battery, Google some more to find that in this case I should "substitute the battery for a known good battery" like we've all got two or three of those knocking about, before finally giving up and taking the bike to a local shop who relieved me of £250 to fix it. For context, I could have sorted out any (and I mean any) issues with mechanical shifting for a few quid on cables in about half an hour, all else being equal.
I get the convenience of it, I accept that things have probably moved on since my first gen system was built. I accept that it's useful for people with weaker hands and I'm really not trying to put people off using it: if it floats your boat and makes your cycling enjoyable, fantastic. But for me, I can't help but feel that, as so often, "maintenance free" translates as "cannot be maintained", and being able to maintain my own bikes is much more important to me than marginal performance gains or being able to see what gear I'm in an a head unit. I've just rebuilt a 1982 Claud Butler with its original drivetrain and no more new parts than a couple of gear cables. Not that this is the be all and end all (and of course, for some riders it's not important at all), but can anyone honestly see an amateur home mechanic being able to do that with a Di2 bike in 45 years?