- Location
- The TerrorVortex
If the Police put the living fear of God into the driver, he may not name the offender but he'll sure as hell have a word or three with her.
Do enjoy the beer
Do enjoy the beer

If the Police put the living fear of God into the driver, he may not name the offender but he'll sure as hell have a word or three with her.
Do enjoy the beer![]()
I am afraid that I cannot possibly comment about fish for fear of incriminating myselfI am rather disappointed that no fish were involved....
One possible, with it being teenagers, might be if the driver was in 'mummys car'?
How many insurance paying parents would be happy to have plod on the doorstep in those circumstances.....
Yep. Works every time.Wasn't there a thread where it was said that all you have to say is 'no comment' to everything and the police won't/can't take it any further.
Ah, but Noodly can/can't, and it's like Alice in Wonderland - weird.. so don't ask....I am afraid that I cannot possibly comment about fish for fear of incriminating myself
Is this a section 59 offence by the driver, especially if the assaulter can't/won't be identified?
Yep. Works every time.
Same if you get caught for drunk driving and as long as you refuse to give any samples they can't touch you for it.
Isn't the penalty the same for DD and failure to provide though?
Read on. I think Cubist is poking fun at some misconceptions here.
........With the current system I would always advise my client to go no comment too if I was a legal advisor. Theres absolutely no benefit to telling the police anything in an interview - UNLESS YOU'RE INNOCENT! I promise you that when we do get innocent people giving us explanations, we do our best to invesigate those too. If you're guilty though, shut the hell up and you'll probably get away with it.
.......