Do you see the difference with HD TV?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
Oh, I see! So HD is better than ordinary digital, but digital is actually (in those terms) worse than analogue anyway. So HD is as good as analogue...

When the time comes, I'll go colour, and pay up, but while I can get a cheap licence, I will. I think you can still get B/W tellies, but they tend to be the tiny portables, not like mine, a massive, um, dunno, 12-15" screen? But then, I'm limited for space in the flat, so any bigger will be a pain to find a place for.

Think of it in cakes. Analogue was like having 5 chocolate cakes and each person/ channel had a chocolate cake each. Digital decided by running things more efficiently that you didn't need a whole chocolate cake each so people shared. The problem came when the accountants came in and started dividing each cake so it fed a quite large family, so channels ended up with a piece of cake about half the size it would be to work well. Digital would work a lot better either if there were more cakes, fewer channels to feed or a few other things. HD is more like a luxury cake where you can taste the difference, but also the bits of cake are quite a bit larger.
 

marzjennings

Legendary Member
Think of it in cakes. Analogue was like having 5 chocolate cakes and each person/ channel had a chocolate cake each. Digital decided by running things more efficiently that you didn't need a whole chocolate cake each so people shared. The problem came when the accountants came in and started dividing each cake so it fed a quite large family, so channels ended up with a piece of cake about half the size it would be to work well. Digital would work a lot better either if there were more cakes, fewer channels to feed or a few other things. HD is more like a luxury cake where you can taste the difference, but also the bits of cake are quite a bit larger.


HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!


Cake!
 

Funtboy

Well-Known Member
Yes, and it's ace.

I don't want to seem materialistic and all that but it does bring pleasure to my eyes.

I only bought it this year mind (for the World Cup) and don't regret a penny of it...
 

potsy

Rambler
Location
My Armchair
Another one here with a 28" 'tube' telly,no interest in HD tbh, not got Sky so hardly any footie to watch,and I don't need to watch Eastenders in HD glory
rolleyes.gif
 

jayonabike

Powered by caffeine & whisky
Location
Hertfordshire
The 'Planet Earth' T.V series was stunning in HD as is most sports. I watch a lot of news and like Sky news in HD for the graphics.
 

Arch

Married to Night Train
Location
Salford, UK
Think of it in cakes

Ok, I can do that.

Analogue was like having 5 chocolate cakes

Yum!

and each person/ channel had a chocolate cake each. Digital decided by running things more efficiently that you didn't need a whole chocolate cake each so people shared. The problem came when the accountants came in and started dividing each cake so it fed a quite large family, so channels ended up with a piece of cake about half the size it would be to work well. Digital would work a lot better either if there were more cakes, fewer channels to feed or a few other things. HD is more like a luxury cake where you can taste the difference, but also the bits of cake are quite a bit larger.

Eh? oh sorry, I was thinking about that cake....

Ok, I get it. It's all academic to me, as I'm too broke to upgrade anyway.
 

martynjc1977

Veteran
I only ask because after polling a number of family members and colleagues it seems many of them are just not able to see the HD difference at all. They simple don't get it?

I do, and I love it - the difference to me is quite obvious and amazing, but for a technology that is destined to become the defacto for TV viewing it seems a little odd that quite a large number of my (albeit small) sample don't appear to appreciate the benefit.

Do you get HD?

My in-laws recently got sky hd, they also could not tell the difference. I checked the connection they had been using and noticed they had been watching through the scart connection, I changed it to the HDMI and they soon noticed the difference lol.
 
Can't notice it at all on the 28" TV, but really can on the 42" one.
I guess that bigger screens need more data to make a smooth picture because the normal signal would just get blown up bigger and therefore more blocky. Therefore HD is more noticeable the bigger the screen you have and less noticeable the smaller.
 

asterix

Comrade Member
Location
Limoges or York
I only ask because after polling a number of family members and colleagues it seems many of them are just not able to see the HD difference at all. They simple don't get it?

I do, and I love it - the difference to me is quite obvious and amazing, but for a technology that is destined to become the defacto for TV viewing it seems a little odd that quite a large number of my (albeit small) sample don't appear to appreciate the benefit.

Do you get HD?

Suggest they go to specsavers?
 

hypnose

New Member
definately, in sports fo sure, movies not so much, video games seem unchanged as well. but yes big difference
 

MacB

Lover of things that come in 3's
If you're in to that sort of thing then this site is a very good resource for info:-

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/

but it does get pretty technical, in particular they are quite scathing about factory settings but it tells you how to alter them for optimal viewing. I've not gone HD yet, I know we will eventually but I don't feel any lack in our viewing ability at the moment. I do, however, have certain luddite tendencies, had same mobile for several years, never exceeded call and text allowances, don't use facebook, twitter etc. Most technological advances at home are fuelled by the kids nagging me. Except for internet access, as I've worked from home off and on for years we have the top level one from Virgin, so we've just bundled phone and tv in with that.
 

davefb

Guru
sd looks terrible, not becuse 'it CANT cope' but because the companies use too high a compression rate .. its a disgrace that we lost perfectly pretty analog tv to awful quality 'pack as many channels in' freeview or even sky normal. ( to be fair , i'm in line of sight to winter hill, used to get a fantastic picture :smile: )

its obvious they do this, because otherwise why do the adverts for HD , that are shown on SD look visually better than the normal quality, it looks like 'it should do'!

this also has the problem that when you spend more on a tv, you see the artifacts more :smile: .
 
Top Bottom