brokenbetty
Über Member
- Location
- London
I'm just glad that story arc has finished so I can stopped making smutty jokes about it
Did you think so? I thought Series 3 was his best.marinyork said:Didn't see a problem with the season at all. First seasons for doctors are usually a bit weird and feel slightly strange - we've just forgotten this because Christopher Ecclestone was stupid enough to do just the one season and David Tennent was unusual in that his strongest season was his first one. Historically the season as a whole compares well either to any of the new doctor whos or first seasons for most of the people that have played the doctor.
The story arc was a mistake though, they were never particularly liked in the past or by british viewers. The other mistake is having the producer writing that many stories, but that's RTD's fault for starting that rather dangerous trend.
jonesy said:Did you think so? I thought Series 3 was his best.
jonesy said:I didn't actually have any objections to this story arc (much better than the Bad Wolf one...). Indeed, as series enders go, the idea of the Pandorica, the prison for the most dangerous thing in the universe, which turned out to be the Doctor, was rather a good one. But I'd agree that Moffat would have been better off concentrating on doing just a couple of stories, and making them the quirky, clever, one-offs in the middle of the series that he did so well before.
marinyork said:Yes. I rate them on the whole lot. Blink/Human Nature/Family of blood were excellent, unfortunately there were some gigantic clangers mixed in there like Smith and Jones, Gridlock and 42. The final three episodes were a good idea but not as well executed as might be despite a delicious casting of Derek Jacobi and John Simm. The other stories, the Dalek ones were not as good as they might have been Shakespeare Code was good and lazarus experiment missed something. All seasons have good, bad, all right, I just think 3 suffered a bit overall. Three was where they got a bit more adventurous with the stories and some of them have worked.
I don't particularly have any objections to the story arc - it's just when I heard I thought as Colin Baker might say 'risky' - people just don't generally like that that much I think. The story arcs in the new series have been haven't been particularly successful either although they seem to generate fan traffic noise on the internet. But it's the story that matters and the final story yeah was fine.
I mean on story arcs you'd probably agree with me on the doctor who ones in the past, like I said other people seem to be much less enthusiastic on them and I see an irritation with them when deployed on other 00s/10s productions.
P.S. I think the biggest failing for this season has been Amy (and Rory). Don't know what they are doing there. Or even the wedding theme has to be repeated again so soon? Mickey already did useless boyfriend and occasional companion reasonably well in the past, I don't think Rory brings anything new on that one. To a certain extent it may have hindered/constrained character development for Amy too.
jonesy said:Ah, well it was because of those three, plus the two Master stories at the end, that I particularly liked Series 3. I agree on the clangers.
jonesy said:Afraid I don't remember many of the classic series story arcs- I didn't actually see that many complete series. The only ones I can think of are the Key to Time and E Space ... others?
jonesy said:Ah, well it was because of those three, plus the two Master stories at the end, that I particularly liked Series 3. I agree on the clangers.