U
User33236
Guest
After trying various combinations I now wear under armour boxer jocks under my padded stuff. As they say, whatever works for you.
I'm amazed ........ Still, if some people insist, they will never know what proper comfort on a bike is.
Modern fabrics wick moisture away.
I'm amazed - race/training shorts with a proper insert, now in this happily modern age cut gender specific for comfort, have always been designed for next to skin wear. Modern fabrics wick moisture away. The only thing between shorts and skin should be chamois cream - or Sudacrem which I used for many years of competition and never, ever, chafed or suffered saddle sores, even in races over 230km.
Still, if some people insist, they will never know what proper comfort on a bike is.
Still doesn't make them suitable for two trips a day... WIcking moisture away doesn't make them magically dry for the ride home from work!
I don't work an 8 hour day.What-your lycra shorts don't dry of sweat after a days (8 hours say) work (assuming it hasn't rained)?
I don't work an 8 hour day.
You do what then?
What does it matter? .
Why you so bothered that I wear underwear on the commute? My reasons stand, my cycling clothes sit in an unheated room when I'm at work, they barely dry out on a good day, hardly going to add sweat into the mix. Tried it a few times but feel more comfortable going home with fresh underwear on rather than damp used shorts.Because lycra dries out in no time, unless it's dripping wet.
You've added a few additional reasons as to why wearing the same pants might not be reasonable which suggests you didn't really buy into the "my shorts don't dry in time for the way home" line.
Well, then I'd be lying. Jeeez.I don't care.
Just be honest with your reason, which isn't that a pair of lycra shorts (that don't get wet anyway-not any decent ones) are somehow soaking wet from a dry commute over a relatively short distance.