Doubling Up On Road

[freecyclist]

Do you want to be a troll?

No , obviously i dont want to be nor am i either.
I jwould just like to understand origamists thought process.

 

[freecyclist]

Troll? Sockpuppet? Genuine Idiot? We could have a poll...

Youve found youre level - an abusive name calling contest.
Carry on.

 

[Origamist]

Yes but why does that make you think i am not a troll, but a sock puppet.

I think you have multiple online identities and are pulling our collective chain as I can't believe you're surprised that most people on here think you're spouting nonsense. Of course, I could be wrong: you could be a troll.

Tell us more about your bikes, cycling interests, etc and let this monomaniacal obsession with "doubling up" go.

 

[theclaud]

Youve found youre level - an abusive name calling contest.
Carry on.

I'll try and drink myself down to yours if you're still around later...

 

[theclaud]

No , obviously i dont want to be nor am i either.
I jwould just like to understand origamists thought process.

I don't fancy your chances.

 

[benb]

Youve found youre level - an abusive name calling contest.
Carry on.

Earlier you called someone a bitter angry mid sexual inadequate, so you're in no position to criticise.

 

[montyboy]

I think you have multiple online identities and are pulling our collective chain as I can't believe you're surprised that most people on here think you're spouting nonsense. Of course, I could be wrong: you could be a troll.

Tell us more about your bikes, cycling interests, etc and let this monomaniacal obsession with "doubling up" go.

Thats an interesting point. What do we think about cyclists doubling up when out riding together ?

 

[freecyclist]

Thats an interesting point. What do we think about cyclists doubling up when out riding together ?

We should discuss that !

 

[freecyclist]

I think you have multiple online identities and are pulling our collective chain as I can't believe you're surprised that most people on here think you're spouting nonsense. Of course, I could be wrong: you could be a troll.

Tell us more about your bikes, cycling interests, etc and let this monomaniacal obsession with "doubling up" go.

Why would anyone need multiple identities to pull anyones chain if that was their intention.
II have voiced opinions , apparently unpopular and to be silenced by any unpleasant means necessary but they are genuine opinions.
As ian said this is a cycling forum and perhaps as ian said i am a loon to have expected anything other than nasty vilification but i am a cyclists , maybe a naive one and i thought maybe this forum was receptive to a variety of opinions.
sadly i was clearly wrong.
Ian was right.

 

[benb]

Why would anyone need multiple identities to pull anyones chain if that was their intention.
II have voiced opinions , apparently unpopular and to be silenced by any unpleasant means necessary but they are genuine opinions.
As ian said this is a cycling forum and perhaps as ian said i am a loon to have expected anything other than nasty vilification but i am a cyclists , maybe a naive one and i thought maybe this forum was receptive to a variety of opinions.
sadly i was clearly wrong.
Ian was right.

Oh get off your persecution complex, no-one has tried to silence you. If they have, they haven't been doing a very good job.

 

[CopperCyclist]

Oh get off your persecution complex, no-one has tried to silence you.

The Moderators might soon!

(this post anyway...)

 

[freecyclist]

The Moderators might soon!

(this post anyway...)

No actually fair play to the moderators , they have recognised that ive got some good ideas and have let the thread proceed.

 

[theclaud]

No actually fair play to the moderators , they have recognised that ive got some good ideas and have let the thread proceed.

Now I know you're having a laugh.

 

[dellzeqq]

Well lets put it like this ; i know as much about sportives as you do about being polite and conducting a evenly tempered debate.
Despite your abrasive manner you give an interesting perspective on sportives that confirms what r2d2 previously said and raises the dilema of allowing potentially dangerous activities on public roads. My own personal opinion is yes i am inclined to allow sportives but i would advise the participants to be considerate of other road users and not partake in any arrogant inconsiderate militant unnecessary 2abreast cycling and whereever practical and safe allow faster traffic to overtake.

dangerous as in nobody getting hurt as opposed to motor traffic being safe as in 2900 people getting killed every year.

How do you intend to impose this ban in any location other than in your head?

 

[freecyclist]

dangerous as in nobody getting hurt as opposed to motor traffic being safe as in 2900 people getting killed every year.

How do you intend to impose this ban in any location other than in your head?

Deliberate misrepresentation - disingenuous delleqq.
"My own personal opinion is yes i am inclined to allow sportives but i would advise the participants to be considerate of other road users and not partake in any arrogant inconsiderate militant unnecessary 2abreast cycling and whereever practical and safe allow faster traffic to overtake."